Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Baker: Coming Around
Opinion Journal ^ | 04/20/03 | JAMES A. BAKER III

Posted on 04/19/2003 9:11:27 PM PDT by Pokey78

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:05:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

I used to back a balanced budget. Now I'm a "reformed drunk."

Our newspapers and television screens are filled with stories of combat and victory, images of empty torture chambers and cheering crowds, and concerns about what happens next, after all the statues and bullies have fallen into the Iraqi dust. This is understandable and proper. Issues of war and peace always come first. But very soon it will be time to emphasize our economy here at home.


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jamesabakeriii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2003 9:11:27 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
excellent!!!
2 posted on 04/19/2003 9:15:44 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Here's hoping for more reformed drunks.
3 posted on 04/19/2003 9:23:38 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"In a perfect world, fiscal discipline would include spending restraint. Thanks in large part to the efforts of Sen. Phil Gramm and others, we had some form of spending restraint from the mid-'80s to the mid-'90s. In today's real world, unfortunately, Congress's appetite for living beyond its means is unchecked by legal or institutional barriers."

How far we have fallen. In the world promised us by the GOP if we only voted to give it control, fiscal discipline would necessarily mean spending restraint. Spending is unrestrained under the GOP.

We were better off when the GOP was a minority. When it comes to spending as a majority party, the GOP pissess down our necks and tells us it's only raining.

Supply side economics has two sides...one side is lower taxes, the other is controlled spending. This GOPBOT and too many others think that cutting taxes alone is the only answer. Well, we are 250 billion dollars in the hole this year so far and counting...


4 posted on 04/19/2003 9:28:39 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Great post!
I like seeing that James Baker is still involved in the discourse. There are not too many people who have the insight that Baker has when it comes to budget matters.

I actually met and talked to Baker once, back in the mid '80s, when he came to a fund raiser here in the Philly area. I have a photo of me and a couple of co-workers with Baker and Dave Christian. (The fund raiser was for Dave Christian who was running against Peter Kostmayer for Congress.) That photo is a personal treasure.
5 posted on 04/19/2003 9:42:26 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Jesse, I could not agree with you more. Where is the restraint in spending, smaller government and deregulation that should also come wih lower taxes? The tax refunds are our money but the massive federal debt is also ours.
6 posted on 04/19/2003 10:29:42 PM PDT by pragmatic_asian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.
AMEN !
7 posted on 04/19/2003 10:31:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Budget defficets haven't ruined this country. Budget surpluses are much more harmful !
8 posted on 04/19/2003 10:33:20 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bump for later read.
9 posted on 04/19/2003 10:34:55 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
>Budget defficets haven't ruined this country. Budget surpluses are much more harmful !

Correct!!! Balanced budgets are a cudgel used to justify high taxes. It doesn't matter if you tax and spend the money or borrow and spend the money: they both divert money from the private sector. The key is to lower the govt brake on the economy by reducing spending.

10 posted on 04/19/2003 10:41:29 PM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
Not exactly. The key is to starve the government , by letting the populace have more of their own money, and keep it out of the hands of the pork barrellers, no matter which party they belong to.
11 posted on 04/19/2003 10:43:47 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Mellon/Kennedy/Reagan/GWB Tax Cut Bush
12 posted on 04/19/2003 10:54:00 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wish Baker were the current treasury secretary.
13 posted on 04/19/2003 10:57:56 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Taking away the money they have to spend is the ONLY way to get them to spend less.

You have to choke them off at the start.
14 posted on 04/19/2003 11:09:19 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
You think Christian might run again? He's made a lot of fans on FOX, that's for sure. OTOH, he's a successful businessman, so he might not want to give up his career.

Agree with you others here about Baker. I would like to see him on t.v. more. Even some mushy 'moderates' I know listen to him.

15 posted on 04/20/2003 12:11:45 AM PDT by Fracas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Deficits are not nearly as harmful to the economy as are high taxes.
16 posted on 04/20/2003 12:25:13 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fracas
You think Christian might run again?

That would be terrific. He really is a sharp guy, and I think he might stand a better chance these days.

Although it would be great to see him dispense with the liberal Greenwood (it's his district now) I don't believe Dave would be inclined to challenge an incumbent Republican. On the other hand, he could run for Specter's seat, and that could certainly be a viable possibility. I don't know how much longer Arlen is going to hang in there. (And, by the way, I have this feeling that Greenwood is eyeballing that seat. Shudder.)

17 posted on 04/20/2003 12:33:04 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wish Baker was still in public service. He was a superb Secretary of State, much better than Colin Powell and one who the President trusted at the highest levels. The one weakness of the Bush foreign policy has been the diplomatic blunders.
18 posted on 04/20/2003 12:38:36 AM PDT by optik_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I've heard the same about Greenwood and agree with your assessment. Specter's making nice-nice with the conservatives, but I keep hoping they're too smart to fall for his Damascus conversion. OTOH, some of my PA friends swear Chris Matthews really is going to run, and even Specter would be preferable to Matthews!

Christian might need a little prodding from some of his fans. He has a nice website and might enjoy getting some encouragement. Maybe I'll mosey over there and do that very thing....

19 posted on 04/20/2003 12:43:30 AM PDT by Fracas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.
I'll drink to that.

Mr. Baker is the original Hammer, I've heard.
Who did W. turn to as spokesman in the 2000 election aftermath? This is a guy who'll tell you when and where to shove it and give you directions.

Mr. Baker also helped form the Coalition for the first Gulf War and convinced Israel to hold off retaliation after being fired upon with Scuds from Hussien.

Thanks for posting. I have great respect for this man.

20 posted on 04/20/2003 1:25:28 AM PDT by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson