Amazing that the article never mentions the one thing which delivered our country into Clinton's filthy hands. Despite what the media kept insisting, Perot's support was stolen from Bush. Without the little egomaniac running, Bush would have won easily.
The reason Bush #1 lost was because CONSERVATIVES AND INDEPENDENTS voted for Ross Perot. Most I know who voted for Perot did so because he seem to be a more conservative/libertarian/pragmatic candidate than Bush #1. Had those people known it would cost conservatives a voice for 8 years, they would never have voted the way they did. Most of them HATED Clinton, and none of them I've met supported anything the left represents.
If there is no real alternative to Bush and his values, he will win - unless the press can convince us to vote for someone else again...
If that does happen, you can say hello to Queen Hillary and her cronies, and say goodbye to the Republic.
Never, ever underestimate the 'divide and conquer' tactics that the DNC is willing to use (along with their liberal democratic accomplices in the media) to win an election.......
Amazing that the article never mentions the one thing which delivered our country into Clinton's filthy hands. Despite what the media kept insisting, Perot's support was stolen from Bush. Without the little egomaniac running, Bush would have won easily.
Two words: Ralph Nader.