Amazing that the article never mentions the one thing which delivered our country into Clinton's filthy hands. Despite what the media kept insisting, Perot's support was stolen from Bush. Without the little egomaniac running, Bush would have won easily.
Two words: Ralph Nader.
It's true that Gore would have won if Nader had not siphoned off 5% of his support, but that has no bearing on the 2004 election. There are people who now support Bush who never would have voted for him three years ago. Without another Perot, Bush can win easily, unless there's some kind of economic or military disaster in the next eighteen months.