I don't know who the f--k you think you are, but you don't know anything about me. You obviously don't get out much, because my 'advisors' are Morgan Stanley, one of the top brokerage firms in the country. And you might want to review the thread, because I never specifically said that I lost money in the market because of President Bush being in the White House (although I will later in this posting).
I have absolutely no idea what this phrase means:By net law, since YOU brought up Nazi ( implication is the same as an outright statement ), then you lose.But you lost anyway, due to your political naifdom. :-) , but may I suggest you up your dosage.
Now...I and everyone else lost money in the market due to President Bush being in the White House. I (and a lot of other people) will hold him responsible for the state of the economy and resulting fleeing of capital, as we should, because he has a responsibility to SHOW SOME LEADERSHIP and SHRINK THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT AND THE TAX BURDEN. No more bulls--t about how the Democrats are out to get him. It didn't stop Ronald Reagan, and it shouldn't stop old W, except that he's got no balls.
While you and the rest of your pals are building statues to your lord and master, he as increased the size of government, larded on the largest budget in history, and practices a kind of statism that frankly frightens me.
So, Bushbots, who is guilty of political naifdom? 