Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
You are so incoherent I can barely understand what you're trying to say, but I do have this to say in response:

I don't know who the f--k you think you are, but you don't know anything about me. You obviously don't get out much, because my 'advisors' are Morgan Stanley, one of the top brokerage firms in the country. And you might want to review the thread, because I never specifically said that I lost money in the market because of President Bush being in the White House (although I will later in this posting).

I have absolutely no idea what this phrase means:By net law, since YOU brought up Nazi ( implication is the same as an outright statement ), then you lose.But you lost anyway, due to your political naifdom. :-) , but may I suggest you up your dosage.

Now...I and everyone else lost money in the market due to President Bush being in the White House. I (and a lot of other people) will hold him responsible for the state of the economy and resulting fleeing of capital, as we should, because he has a responsibility to SHOW SOME LEADERSHIP and SHRINK THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT AND THE TAX BURDEN. No more bulls--t about how the Democrats are out to get him. It didn't stop Ronald Reagan, and it shouldn't stop old W, except that he's got no balls.

While you and the rest of your pals are building statues to your lord and master, he as increased the size of government, larded on the largest budget in history, and practices a kind of statism that frankly frightens me.

So, Bushbots, who is guilty of political naifdom?

193 posted on 04/21/2003 5:26:56 AM PDT by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: ModernDayCato
Neither I nor my writing is " incoherent. You; however, have several acute problems, that should be seen to.

Oh, dear, I DO not only " get out ", but I know Wall Street well; far better than you do. It is beyond ridiculous to claim that President Bush had ANYTHING , whatsoever, to do with the down turn of any market/your losses, when he had nothing to do with the BUBBLE, the start of the BEAR MARKET ( hint, hint ... that began in the third week of March 2000, when Clinton was president ! ), the continuation of it, nor the hanky panky that goes back to not only gore's getting Justice after Microsoft, but the strings that Rubin was pulling.

It doesn't matter WHICH firm your account is at. You have a lousy advisor. You don't understand the market and shouldn't be in it. No president has absolute control over the market, economics of this nation, nor whatever it is, that you seem to imagine he does.

There is a net rule, often invoked here on FR, that whosoever yells " NAZI ", even by implication, first, as a refutation, immediately loses the argument. I didn't invent it and you should know about it as it has been and is used all the time here, when someone pulls this garbage. :-)

Gee, I'm not building statues to Jesus the Christ; but, HE is my " LORD and master ".

Not only do you know or understand finacial markets, you neither know much about or understamd politics and what a president can and can NOT do. Your abject stupidity and incivility is only outshown by your inability to write a cogent, coherent post. ;^)

194 posted on 04/21/2003 9:52:41 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson