To: HAL9000
I am one of those who is glad to have a vivid accounts from Iraq, like this one from John Burns.
But I have to agree with the theme of some other people here -- it seems to me like the NY Times is really getting on the anti-Saddam bandwagon only now that the regime is gone.
I think it's fair to ask what they knew about Iraq in the months before the war started. I'm sorry to say that I bet they knew a lot more than they printed, and I suspect they held back information only because of their anti-Bush animus.
Is that a fair suspicion?
To: 68skylark
There's often an exception to the rule, e.g. Burns or Safire.
20 posted on
04/20/2003 8:08:04 AM PDT by
HAL9000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson