Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000
I am one of those who is glad to have a vivid accounts from Iraq, like this one from John Burns.

But I have to agree with the theme of some other people here -- it seems to me like the NY Times is really getting on the anti-Saddam bandwagon only now that the regime is gone.

I think it's fair to ask what they knew about Iraq in the months before the war started. I'm sorry to say that I bet they knew a lot more than they printed, and I suspect they held back information only because of their anti-Bush animus.

Is that a fair suspicion?
19 posted on 04/20/2003 7:35:51 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: 68skylark
There's often an exception to the rule, e.g. Burns or Safire.
20 posted on 04/20/2003 8:08:04 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson