To: Vinnie
They could have arrested Koresh any time he was in town but no, thObjection!
Hearsy and anecdotal!
An armed 'Koresh', determined to stay-out-of-jail at all cost, walking the streets and 'approached' by law enforcment would likely start a to-the-death fire-fight!
No?
Yes!
185 posted on
04/19/2003 6:09:38 PM PDT by
_Jim
(y)
To: _Jim
NO!
Wouldn't have a show then is the reason. BATF wanted a show.
To: _Jim
"determined to stay-out-of-jail at all cost"
Proof, please.
Also, you state they shouldn't have tried to take David on the streets for safety reasons, but they SHOULD take him at his home with all those supposedly illegal machineguns???
You're not making any sense.
You are suggesting that taking a single man on the street is more dangerous than taking him at his compound surrounded by others and massive amounts of arms???
Get real.
336 posted on
04/19/2003 9:52:21 PM PDT by
PatrioticAmerican
(If the only purpose of assault weapons is to kill lots of people quickly, why do police have them?)
To: _Jim
Objection!
Hearsy and anecdotal!
An armed 'Koresh', determined to stay-out-of-jail at all cost, walking the streets and 'approached' by law enforcment would likely start a to-the-death fire-fight!
No?
Yes!
/////
Another ludicrous, self-serving post by Special Agent _Jim.
Why even post this? Your conscience wouldn't by any chance be bothering you from your actions -- or those of your friends and associates -- at Waco, would it?
Logically: A firefight to the death, as you so absurdly envision, between a lone Koresh and the local Sheriff's deputies would hardly have resulted in some 70 deaths, as your devoutly defended FBI-US Army raid produced.
That's it, isn't it: Why settle the issue with one or two (or, more likely, zero) casualties, when you can bag 70 "anti-Gummint" pro-gunners?
339 posted on
04/19/2003 10:09:12 PM PDT by
BenR2
((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson