Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThirstyMan
I completely agree with you that many if not most soldiers, Marines and pilots would either refuse to kill US civilians or would be sympathetic to their cause. I was merely answering the basic criticism that governments with tanks, jets and nuclear weapons can instantaneously squash rebels armed only with small arms, rockets and grenades.
359 posted on 04/22/2003 1:34:05 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
I was merely answering the basic criticism that governments with tanks, jets and nuclear weapons can instantaneously squash rebels armed only with small arms, rockets and grenades.

OK and thanks for the clarification. There is a role for small arms in any defense or offense. The way the attack waves have worked in the last two Gulf Wars has been to apply so much military might ["soften"] that by the time their use is appropriate, to pull the trigger seems futile. The assumption that the American military could be engaged to wage this kind of war against its own citizens is a rediculous assumption reserved for the conspiracy nuts, imho.

361 posted on 04/22/2003 6:03:01 AM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson