Posted on 04/17/2003 7:35:42 AM PDT by BunnySlippers
Why even waste your own time worrying about such a thing? This article was about a bottle being found after 60 years......or is that suspect as well?
Go start your own thread if Holocaust statistics stick in your craw so easily. Otherwise, get used to the flames.
The Nazi regime in Germany used the camps to kill six million European Jews as well as numerous resistance fighters and members of political parties opposing Adolf Hitler's rule.[ snip ]
About 18 million people were imprisoned in such camps during the Nazi regime of which 11 million died, estimates show.
I've seen that total dead figure also as ~10million in the camps.
I'm completely sure that you already know. Institute for Historical Review. One of the prime outlets for holocoust-denial.
And what did I say that isn't true?
Your claim that no historians think there were extermination camps, for example.
Now, if you want to do this forum a favour, get your stinking carcass over to a neo-nazi/jihadist/holocoust-denier septic tank where you belong - such as LibertyForum. I'm sure you already have an account there. Hoplophile or Skunk?
Not "dismissed", I think. More that those 5 million was a diverse group and the fact that they fell into the system for other reasons than planned extinction. What makes the Jewish group special is not the number or that they are the largest single group, but the fact that they went down in a planned genocide - a premeditated (attempted) murder of a whole people.
I don't mind the numbers being broken out (even as '6million Jews and enormous number of those who opposed the Nazis or were considered subhuman') but when "numerous" is used to define a group of people caught up by the machine of death that is almost as large as the single largest (targeted) group then to me it underdefines the horror.
As I understand it, the first "euthenasia" program was to kill of the sick, weak, and mentally handicapped (they lived in "lavish" hospitals while the German citizens were poor, so the rational went).
And not to take anything away from Hitler, but Stalin killed even more people and yet the figures are brushed over. There have been other bloody purges in the 20th century as well. People said, "never again" but it did happen time and time again afterwards.
The Dachau Concentration Camp officially opened on Wednesday, March 22, 1933, a scant six weeks later.
The above is from http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/. In 1978, while stationed in Naples, Italy, I read a history of Dachau, which mentioned the gas chambers. My friend, by saying there were no death camps on German soil, you are not only lying but attempting a extremely poor Clintonian word games. Hit the road, liar!
The German bluff was something like that the buildings were for incineration/cremation to reduce the health risks in the camps (where as the mechanism of that death was obscured).
I recall seeing a documentary on this once (on PBS or one of the cable channels).
We may be encountering this same tactic in Iraq today (there are some on the left who deny that the structures we've run across were prisons or torture chambers).
The proof comes in eye witness accounts (and records) and measuring trace amounts of toxins.
Perhaps you could pause and reflect why poking holes in the holocaust methods, locations, numbers is so important to you.
Oh, so that was what you said, uh? Well, wrong. And it is the classic line from the holocoust denial crowd. To give you just two examples from Germany (there are more): Buchenwald and Ravensbruck. But of course you know this. And of course you know the revisionist off-the-hook wiggles ;).
Thanks for clearing up the IHR thing
You know the revisionist talking points, you quote writings from historians regarding the holocoust, and you're telling me that you didn't know what IHR is??? Pull the other one :).
No thanks, however, for the string of abuse
No thanks needed. Do take a look at LF, though - you'll fit right in - if you're not already there. Of course, I think you are.
The Holocoust was what happened to Jews everywhere at the hands of the Germans and their allies in WWII. I think that is a fairly correct way of putting it.
The "Final solution" was what Hitler, his generals, and one important other party came up with. And that focussed on the European Jewry. However, the "important other" in this process was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who actually was a personal friend of Hitler and who did his best to emulate the führer with respect to killing off Jews, and who sent troops to Nazi Germany. There seems to be little doubt that the "final solution" was decided by Hitler already before Wannsee, and he and the Mufti was quite in agreement on this question. The Mufti was even more enthusiastic than most of Hitler's closest officers.
And not to take anything away from Hitler, but Stalin killed even more people and yet the figures are brushed over.
True, there has been other atrocities and genocides. But not "brushed over": when much is known about the Holocoust, it's partly because Jewish organizations and individuals have not let us forget (much to the revisionist critters chagrin). Where are the Russian organizations hammering the pogroms into the public memory? Where are the Cambodian efforts to never let the world forget the killing fields?
Of course, there has been books written on these subjects. However, too often when someone mentions communist atrocities, some slimy character will pop up and start the standard neo-nazi spiel about how "the Jews invented communism".
Again, I'm curious as to why this is such an important thing for you to spend time attempting to split hairs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.