Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert
The philosophical subtext here is that **betrayal** led to Saddam's defeat, not coalition military skill or the rot at the core of the Iraq regime.

From a propaganda perspective this feeds into Arab self-delisions about their inherent abilities and need for moral purity.

9 posted on 04/17/2003 7:43:58 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NativeNewYorker
The philosophical subtext here is that **betrayal** led to Saddam's defeat, not coalition military skill or the rot at the core of the Iraq regime.

Except if you scratch a little deeper its obvious the "betrayal" was only necessary because of certain defeat.

12 posted on 04/17/2003 7:46:30 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NativeNewYorker
NN Yorker,
Yup. This is the core around which an Arabic "dolchstoss" myth might form, as with the post-WW1 Germans. Not beaten in battle, but betrayed by wicked leaders.
14 posted on 04/17/2003 7:53:13 AM PDT by Gefreiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NativeNewYorker
This is little more than David Irving, a man with his own agenda, promoting a 'stabbed in the back' theory. He calls von Stauffenberg a traitor, for goodness sake.
16 posted on 04/17/2003 7:56:48 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Class of '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NativeNewYorker
From a propaganda perspective this feeds into Arab self-delisions about their inherent abilities and need for moral purity.

Yeah, I thought the comments about the Rep. Guard causing a 'living hell' for the US military were a bit over the top. The battles that did take place were a turkey shoot. ( No offense to Turks...)

18 posted on 04/17/2003 7:57:25 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NativeNewYorker
Thank you for your excellent observation.

This story's implicit stance is that the "valiant Arab forces" would have defeated the US Army and Marines, but that they were sold out by venal bosses.

We know that in reality committed Iraqi commanders were losing hundreds of soldiers a day to desertion.

20 posted on 04/17/2003 8:00:09 AM PDT by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NativeNewYorker
...**betrayal** led to Saddam's defeat, not coalition military skill....

There are two sides to this truth of betrayal. The coalition saught and received the betrayals. There is no loss of honor for seeking and obtaining the capitulation.

It will be seen as a different weapon used to subdue Saddam. Money, plain old US$, did the trick when used along with extreme skill.

Could have any others pulled this off? No! certainly not.

The message still remains......"Don't screw with America. Those boys are good!"

28 posted on 04/17/2003 8:14:53 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson