Skip to comments.
Impact of Iraqi defeat on Islam
WorldNetDaily.Com ^
| Posted: April 17, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
Posted on 04/17/2003 1:07:32 AM PDT by Bobby777
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: The Great Satan
Isn't it about time these people gave it up and became Christians, like everyone else? Didn't conversion to Islam originally occur because of its military success? So what lesson should be drawn from its military failures? (For cultural reasons, I think Near Eastern Moslems are more likely to accept Bahaiism than Christianity. But if they do become Bahais, they will no longer be tempted to become terrorists, and thus a threat to us.)
Why do Moslems regard any non-Moslem occupation of any part of the Middle East as so unacceptable, but at the same time apparently think that Christians should accept the Moslem occupation of the earliest Christian lands?
To: Bobby777
President Bush at the WTC-"You can't hear me? I can hear you and soon those people who knocked down these walls will be hearing you too!" Or in Sadamn's case....breathing dirt.
Pray for GW and Our Troops
22
posted on
04/17/2003 8:04:17 AM PDT
by
bray
(Old Glory Means Freedom)
To: Bobby777
What I think is most sickening about the Arab religion/culture is the use of their own children as suicide bombers and the use of children as human shields, such as by the feyadeen in Iraq. Allah must be outraged by such people!
23
posted on
04/17/2003 8:17:35 AM PDT
by
expatpat
To: Bobby777
This is what seems to escape the "feel-gooders" and peaceniks.
The struggle is for survival against primitives with the unlimited ability to destroy civilization, since they are not bound by the rules of the civilized.
There is only one currency they understand. It may not be pretty but we ignore that reality at our peril.
Ignorance continues to be our greatest enemy.
To: JasonC; KC_Conspirator
"three divisions?"
3rd + 101st + I MEF + Brit Div + Brigade of 82nd + some others = 4+ Divisions
25
posted on
04/17/2003 8:36:36 AM PDT
by
ironman
To: Straight Vermonter
Is it not incredible that with all of the oil wealth the middle east has, with all of the military hardware they have purchased, that they seem incapable of fielding a credible military?
Actually it's been in their mindset all along. Ever since WWI during the Arab revolt the British tried to give the Arab army training and discipline in fighting a modern army (modern for then). The Arab response was "Give us Guns (meaning Artillery) and keep the training."
They feel (honestly), that their zeal for battle against the infidel can overcome any training anyone can give them.
We've just seen the fallacy of that thought process.
Semper Fi
26
posted on
04/17/2003 8:41:13 AM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(Another Marine Reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell)
To: Bobby777
"some believe, that during the Tribulation, a great number of Arabs, far greater than today, may become believers in Christ ... because of the reconciliation between Jacob and Esau in Genesis 33, among other passages saying different things ..." Of course, those are the ones who attempt to interpret the New Testament through the Old Testament instead of the other way around.
27
posted on
04/17/2003 9:25:30 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(Marxist DemocRATS, Nader-Greens, and Militant Islam are a clear and present danger to our Freedoms.)
To: Bobby777
After a few weeks of R&R it will be time to crusade into Damascus and Tehran.
28
posted on
04/17/2003 10:51:37 AM PDT
by
Mat_Helm
To: aristeides
Why do Moslems regard any non-Moslem occupation of any part of the Middle East as so unacceptable, but at the same time apparently think that Christians should accept the Moslem occupation of the earliest Christian lands?That is a very good observation, and one that the mainstream press that always portrays Muslims as "victims" of Western crusades does not have the integrity to deal with honestly. The crusades was a concerted attempt to regain land brutally invaded and conquered by Muslims a few centuries earlier. Muslims have never gotten over being kicked out of Spain, let alone Israel.
Didn't conversion to Islam originally occur because of its military success? So what lesson should be drawn from its military failures? (For cultural reasons, I think Near Eastern Moslems are more likely to accept Bahaiism than Christianity. But if they do become Bahais, they will no longer be tempted to become terrorists, and thus a threat to us.)
Bahaiism is persecuted today under the Islamic regime in Iran, as well as Mazdaism (Zoroastrianism), the religion of the Persian empire. A moderate Islam is possible, but that is not the trend in Islam at the mement.
To: stripes1776
I doubt moderate Islam is possible as a viable alternative..moderate Islam is apostate..those who become adept will always return or seek to return Islam to its purer form..imo
30
posted on
04/17/2003 12:59:50 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson