Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush calls for end to UN sanctions on Iraq
AFP ^ | April 16, 2003

Posted on 04/16/2003 1:21:24 PM PDT by Shermy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2003 1:21:24 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy
What I want to see is President Bush calling for an end to the UN.
2 posted on 04/16/2003 1:24:20 PM PDT by 11B3 (Happiness IS a warm gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3; okie01
What I want to see is daily protests in front of the Palestine Hotel by Iraqis demanding that sanctions be dropped and all moneys held by the UN returned. The "anti-war camp" will go beserk, from the profiteering axis of weasels down to the parasitical NGOs.
3 posted on 04/16/2003 1:26:53 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Let's see if France vetos this unless the new Iraq agrees to honor the contracts France had with the old Iraq. I would not put this past them.
4 posted on 04/16/2003 1:28:35 PM PDT by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3; Shermy
It's a great start. This development has just one intent....to dare the U.N. to keep up sanctions, thereby risking the appearance of being hateful toward the poor, hungry, and pleading Iraqi people. The Left hates sanctions - and yet we may now actually see them embrace witholding to the needy. Gad, I will so enjoy watching them on that side - so WE can accuse them of starving children!
5 posted on 04/16/2003 1:29:40 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Bush calls for end to UN sanctions on Iraq

They'll demand a quid pro quo for any action that won't be worth the cost. Why not just ignore the sanctions? Everybody else did while Saddam was in power.

6 posted on 04/16/2003 1:32:08 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Bush calls for end to UN sanctions on Iraq

They'll demand a quid pro quo for any action that won't be worth the cost. Why not just ignore the sanctions? Everybody else did while Saddam was in power.

7 posted on 04/16/2003 1:32:13 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Kofi Annan France Germany Russia China would let the whole country starve rather than coperate with the USA
After all it was they who kept Saddam in power in the first place...and could have easily gotten rid of him by demanding he step down years ago...
OR have allowed the USA to take out Saddam after GW1
8 posted on 04/16/2003 1:32:22 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
the UN will probably increase sanctions now
9 posted on 04/16/2003 1:33:03 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"What I want to see is daily protests in front of the Palestine Hotel by Iraqis demanding that sanctions be dropped and all moneys held by the UN returned."

Sounds like a wonderful opportunity for a FReep by the Baghdad chapter...

10 posted on 04/16/2003 1:33:53 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExpatCanuck
I'll be very surprised if they don't try this but considering that there is no functioning government in Iraq who exactly is supposed to honor the contracts? And while they're trying to sort that out is when you do as Shermy suggests and have thousands of Iraqis outside the Palestine Hotel and what's left of the French Embassy screaming for relief. We'll just have to insist that, UN or no UN, the sanctions are null and void. It will be for the children, after all.
11 posted on 04/16/2003 1:42:07 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
We probably will ignore the sanctions, but it's important to require the U.N. to go on record in this matter. Remember, the goal is to keep exposing the U.N. for what they are - scum. The administration must keep the pressure on the U.N. until we get to a point where polls in this country tip against the U.S. participating with the U.N. Only then can the 'kill' be made. Remember, the small percentage of conservatives in the U.S. will not prevail in getting the U.S. out of the U.N. It will take a majority of Americans seeing the light before that dream can be realized.

This administration has been absolutely stealth in its PR war against the U.N. - and it started in the first few months of Bush taking office. You can't name the moves they have taken, as they go unnoticed by the media (because the Congress has little to say about U.N.-related decisions), but they have been myriad over the last two years.

12 posted on 04/16/2003 1:45:16 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Scott McClellan, I remember that name:

Presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said, "The president supports the current law (the Clinton gun ban), and he supports reauthorization of the current law."

13 posted on 04/16/2003 1:46:30 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Bush calls for end to UN sanctions on Iraq

If it were only true...

14 posted on 04/16/2003 1:46:56 PM PDT by m1-lightning (The War Protest is a Quagmire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Hasn't France said it would veto this?
15 posted on 04/16/2003 1:48:29 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The problem is that companies will be afraid to sign contracts with Iraq until this gets cleared up. They could open themselves up to lawsuits. Stupid I know but a fact.
16 posted on 04/16/2003 1:53:25 PM PDT by arkfreepdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ExpatCanuck
Let's see if France vetos this unless the new Iraq agrees to honor the contracts France had with the old Iraq. I would not put this past them

Don't mess with Texas, that would be UNwise

17 posted on 04/16/2003 1:54:36 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
What I want to see is President Bush calling for an end to the UN.

Yeah, that'll happen...Satan will be skiing when it does.

18 posted on 04/16/2003 1:54:58 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I know that the UN and the Democraps have a lot in common these days, strutting and posturing on the sidelines, screaming their fool heads off trying to find something to make themselves appear to be relevant, but stymied by W at every turn in the road.
19 posted on 04/16/2003 1:55:16 PM PDT by johnb838 (Free Republic of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Great tactical move.

Now they have to vote with us, or decide (again) to screw the Iraqi people.

Dominique de Vichy must be getting another headache.

20 posted on 04/16/2003 1:55:46 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson