Skip to comments.
Injured big-game hunter takes aim at
bullet manufacturers
Star Tribune (Minnesota) ^
| 16 April 2003
| Howie Padilla
Posted on 04/16/2003 12:08:17 PM PDT by 45Auto
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:38:52 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
When a professional big-game hunter on safari in Africa shot a charging lion from about 30 yards away, he expected that the cat would die, or at least be stopped.
Instead, the lion mauled the marksman.
It wasn't bad aim, but bad bullets that allowed the lion to take Rolf Rohwer temporarily out of the hunting game, according to a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday against the bullet manufacturers, one of which is the Federal Cartridge Co. of Anoka.
(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: badshot; banglist; idiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-162 next last
I guess that'll teach him to use enough gun, like maybe the .416 Rigby or the .500 Nitro Express. Although, the .458 Win Mag, with proper ammunition and proper shot placement will do the trick.
1
posted on
04/16/2003 12:08:17 PM PDT
by
45Auto
To: 45Auto
>>> Rohwer, of Scotland, is a wildlife biologist who has more than 30 years of African hunting and wildlife management experience
what's wrong with this picture?
2
posted on
04/16/2003 12:10:53 PM PDT
by
snooker
To: 45Auto
Franecke said from his office in San Rafael, Calif. I can't say that only in california would you find a lawyer slimy enough to bring a law suit this stupid, but I can say that you'll find lots and lots of the slimy ones there.
To: FateAmenableToChange
Rohwer was trying a new type of ammunitionNice time for trying something new there, Einstein.
4
posted on
04/16/2003 12:13:53 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: 45Auto
I have no sympathy.
First, test the ammo on something that won't kill you, idiot.
Second, the essence of big game hunting is the very real danger to the hunter. You picked on the lion and the lion ate your ass. Justice was well served.
Case dismissed!
To: 45Auto
The article makes it look like the hunter-biologist was at fault. I have always though Federal was a great ammo company. I have some Winchester .270 rounds that shoot great also.
6
posted on
04/16/2003 12:14:18 PM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(You fight gravity with levity.)
To: 45Auto
"The lion died basically while chewing on my client."
The lion liked the dinner, but detested the whine.
7
posted on
04/16/2003 12:15:19 PM PDT
by
dead
To: 45Auto
Thin skin? I can't imagine the difference between Buffalo skin and Lion skin would be that much. Elephant skin would be a different matter. Could have been a defective bullet but I doubt it. Wonder where he hit him?
8
posted on
04/16/2003 12:15:43 PM PDT
by
dljordan
To: 45Auto
9
posted on
04/16/2003 12:15:43 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: 45Auto
Heh...he took on the big cat and lost. He should top whining and be glad he's not dead.
10
posted on
04/16/2003 12:16:55 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: 45Auto
I've seen boxes of hunting ammuition that clearly indicate what skin-thickness the bullets are intended for, thin-skinned, thick-skinned, etc. If he used thick-skinned bullets for a lion, it's his error not the manufacturers.
To: 45Auto
Everyone knows that a personal injury lawyer is much more dangerous than a charging lion. Therefore show the jury a test. Shoot 100 p. i. lawyers with this bullet and time how long it takes for them to die.
To: coloradan
What is a good round for a thin skinned attorney.? Is it best to shoot him between frivilous suits or to shoot him during a frivilous suit?
To: 45Auto
He ought to try some of those depleted uranium bullets. Even if the lion survives and kill you, you going knowing that the toxic bullet will eventually poison the lion.
Or so the leftists would have us believe.
14
posted on
04/16/2003 12:24:24 PM PDT
by
x1stcav
(HooAhh!)
To: Puppage
Well there's his problem. He forgot to bring a tasty native with him. < /sarcasm>
15
posted on
04/16/2003 12:25:09 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Paranoia is when you realize that tin foil hats just focus the mind control beams.)
To: dljordan
A minister who had spent most of his life as a missionary in Africa once showed me a chunk of hippo skin with a medium calibre bullet embedded in it. The skin, about 1-1/2" thick, had stopped it completely.
Hippos are highly territorial, not to mention bad tempered, and frequently kill humans.
Sinced the hippo was missing this particular chunk of skin, I have to assume that the hunter had a buddy with an elephant gun.
16
posted on
04/16/2003 12:25:11 PM PDT
by
MalcolmS
To: Wolfie
Some days you eat the bear, I mean lion,
And some days the lion eats (part of) you.
17
posted on
04/16/2003 12:25:59 PM PDT
by
wireman
To: Bluntpoint
Is it legal to bait an attorney, say with a slip and fall victim, where the owner of the property where he fell is insured or otherwise a deep pocket?
To: Bluntpoint
What is a good round for a thin skinned attorney.? The BB. One million of them, at a one second interval.
19
posted on
04/16/2003 12:28:10 PM PDT
by
Cachelot
(~ In waters near you ~)
To: Puppage
"When Remington introduced the 416, it was not in Africa. A group of hunting writer went to the Alaska peninsula to try the 416 on the world's largest deer, the Alaska-Yukon moose. And the hunters said they did not feel at all overgunned for the job." "The large frontal area and greater bullet weight give it great striking effect on big game, even though its muzzle energy rating is modestly spectacular. Its problem is that the large frontal area depletes velocity at longer ranges.
Thus, the 458 is a specialized, short range cartridge.""Comparing the 458 and 416 factory loads, the 416 does not have the weight or frontal area of the 458. But in terms of raw energy, it hits harder than the bigger bullet. Because of smaller frontal area and better ballistic coefficient, the 416 holds its velocity longer and penetrates better."
This was purely a lousy shot by this guy who even with his experience panicked. I guess a charging lion at less than 30 yards would scare the crap out anybody! The gun and round was good enough for the job, but you got to hit the animal squarely. I figure the muzzle energy of this load to be around 5000 ft-pounds, certainly not decreased much at 30 yards. The bullet was designed to retain 95% of its weight and to produce a large, deep wound channel. There's no way the gun, the loaded round, nor the bullet could be at fault here. The guy just panicked and merely wounded the lion; and everybody knows that a quick follow-up shot by the backup man (if there was one) would have been a good idea. Nature is not forgiving.
20
posted on
04/16/2003 12:32:32 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-162 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson