Skip to comments.
Columbia President feels the heat; admits receiving 15,000 emails opposing leftist professor
Posted on 04/16/2003 8:16:03 AM PDT by Stop Legal Plunder
At an invitation-only alumni reception in Washington, DC, yesterday, Columbia University President Lee Bollinger defended his refusal to fire Nicholas deGenova, the controversial professor who called for a "million Mogadishus," while admitting the public outcry, including 15,000 emails, was hurting Columbia's reputation.
In response to an angry alumnus' question about the controversy and its negative impact on Columbia's reputation and alumni donations, Bollinger said that deGenova's remarks, which occured during a faculty-organized "teach-in" and included a claim that "U.S. patriotism is inseparable from imperial warfare and white supremacy," were "reprehensible," but claimed they were protected by the First Amendment.
Bollinger said it was vital for a university to stand up for academic freedom and that taking such a stand required protecting the right of academics to express their opinions, even if such includes advocating "murder," as he described deGenova's position. Bollinger acknowledged that such a stand was costly, volunteering that not only had he received the aforementioned 15,000 emails but that the volume of phone calls was keeping his voicemail full of messages from those demanding deGenova be fired.
So this Ivy Tower university president is feeling the heat. But Columbia's endowment is big enough that he's been able to ignore the pressure so far. Perhaps those sending Bollinger emails should cc them to Columbia trustees, as they have the final legal authority over hiring and firing at the university.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academia; academicfreedom; bollinger; columbia; columbiau; columbiauniversity; degenova; firstamendment; freespeech; ivyleague; leebollinge; leebollinger; marxism; mogadishu; politicalcorrectness; theleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Can you list a source for this information?
2
posted on
04/16/2003 8:19:54 AM PDT
by
kipj
To: Stop Legal Plunder
"Bollinger said it was vital for a university to stand up for academic freedom [of the left and non-Christians] and that taking such a stand required protecting the right of academics to express their opinions..."
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Didn't mention how much money he raised while in DC. Hope someone took him aside after the event and explained the facts of life. The responsible alumni simply must keep the pressure on.
4
posted on
04/16/2003 8:20:08 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: Stop Legal Plunder
I wonder how many emails Degenerate received? (He got a scathing one from me...)
5
posted on
04/16/2003 8:20:25 AM PDT
by
HassanBenSobar
(I now inform you that you are too far from reality!)
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Lee Bollinger is a leftist elitist who was previously president of the people's university of Michigan. On his watch at the people's university of Michigan, the art of discrimination against white people was refined, and he is listed as a defendent in at least one of the anti-racist cases currently before the US Supreme Court.
It is no wonder that he would defend this chunk of puke professor at Columbia.
6
posted on
04/16/2003 8:20:35 AM PDT
by
RushLake
(In a different generation and a different war, Michael Moore would have lead the flight to canada.)
To: Stop Legal Plunder
ahem...how bout posting the emails for the professor and his boss...again? :)
Time to pile on and get the traitor off that campus.
To: Stop Legal Plunder
More information on the controversy can be found at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-derussy040703.asp
To: Stop Legal Plunder
This liar knows that Columbia, a private institution, is not bound by the 1st amendment as a public one would be. Liar is he, Yoda says.
9
posted on
04/16/2003 8:22:40 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: Stop Legal Plunder
How can a university president be so obtuse? The First Amendment has no relevance to the decision of a private university to hire or fire an employee.
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Bollinger said that deGenova's remarks . . . were protected by the First Amendment.I'm far from the first to make this remark, but it bears repeating: Bollinger and others who rely upon the First Amendment to protect De Genova are either idiots or liars.
Here's the relevant part of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech."
Congress!! Not a private institution like Columbia. The First Amendment in absolutely no way limits Columbia's right to fire De Genova!
To: Stop Legal Plunder
"Bollinger said it was vital for a university to stand up for academic freedom and that taking such a stand required protecting the right of academics to express their opinions, even if such includes advocating "murder," as he described deGenova's position."
"Columbia University President Lee Bollinger defended his refusal to fire Nicholas deGenova, the controversial professor who called for a "million Mogadishus,"
Perhaps if students started wearing T-Shirts with the Slogan "Million Columbines" these jackass SOB's would get a clue!!!
12
posted on
04/16/2003 8:23:46 AM PDT
by
Dacus943
To: lady lawyer
GMTA!
To: governsleastgovernsbest
What does GMTA mean?
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Bollinger said that deGenova's remarks, which occured during a faculty-organized "teach-in" and included a claim that "U.S. patriotism is inseparable from imperial warfare and white supremacy," were "reprehensible," but claimed they were protected by the First Amendment.If I own a business, my employee has ever right in the world to insult my customers. However, he doesn't have the right to do it as my employee.
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Columbia is now a laughingstock, having demonstrated to the world that it lacks the basic sense to get rid of a professor that lacks intellectual honesty and a realistic view of the world.
16
posted on
04/16/2003 8:25:09 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(I predict hysteria at the UN)
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Only 15,000??? We can do better than that!!!
17
posted on
04/16/2003 8:25:39 AM PDT
by
lawgirl
(Bad spellers of the world--UNTIE!!!)
To: nutmeg
ping
18
posted on
04/16/2003 8:26:06 AM PDT
by
stanz
To: lady lawyer
GMTA= Great Minds Think Alike and your post is smack on- I can't stand how people dont' get the distinction.
19
posted on
04/16/2003 8:26:50 AM PDT
by
lawgirl
(Bad spellers of the world--UNTIE!!!)
To: Stop Legal Plunder
Bollinger said it was vital for a university to stand up for academic freedom and that taking such a stand required protecting the right of academics to express their opinions, even if such includes advocating "murder," as he described deGenova's position.
Dr. Bollinger is stupid. There is no absolute right of freedom of speech as he seems to think there is. Even Justice Marshall indicated that you couldn't cry "fire" in a crowded theater without suffering the consequences. It seems that he wants to protect De Genova from the consequences of advocating murder.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson