Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HenryLeeII
...or no other outcome would have been allowed...

Of course not. The jury would have certainly been made up of Unionists who would have voted to convict based on the evidence the government provided. Why would you find that so surprising?

888 posted on 05/05/2003 2:57:35 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Of course not. The jury would have certainly been made up of Unionists who would have voted to convict based on the evidence the government provided. Why would you find that so surprising?

So, what you're saying is the Federal government didn't have a case, they would have held a kangaroo court show trial, and that law and the Constitution don't matter. Do you vote for Democrat leftists like Wlat does?

906 posted on 05/06/2003 6:30:48 AM PDT by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 888 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson