[HenryLeeII]

Of course not. The jury would have certainly been made up of Unionists who would have voted to convict based on the evidence the government provided. Why would you find that so surprising?

So, what you're saying is the Federal government didn't have a case, they would have held a kangaroo court show trial, and that law and the Constitution don't matter. Do you vote for Democrat leftists like Wlat does?

[Non-Sequitur]

So, what you're saying is the Federal government didn't have a case, they would have held a kangaroo court show trial, and that law and the Constitution don't matter. Do you vote for Democrat leftists like Wlat does?

My, aren't we plesant this morning. As for your ridiculous synopsis, the trial would have been fair and the evidence would have been clearly presented. The jury would have been made up of people who were not hard line rebel supporters but who agreed that the southern actions were illegal. If that constitutes a 'kangaroo court' then, of course, you must be right. You are apparently right about everything.