Nope ! Nor do I think he likes his student, Saddam, either ! . . .
Posted on 04/15/2003 4:36:35 AM PDT by doriangrey
I awoke today to the television showing pictures of Iraqis kissing photos of George W. Bush. Above my fireplace is a framed print of our leader and I wondered if I should not do the same thing as the Iraqis on the film loops. I realized that such an act would have been 27 months in arrears as my debt to him began on the day that he entered office.
It was a month ago, when I was closing on my new home, that I started to comprehend just how much this President means to me. My lawyer, for absolutely no reason, began railing against the President and calling him an ‘abject failure.´ What caused this outburst I don´t know as we were discussing water rights at the time. My reaction was to become furious which later surprised me. An argument ensued for several minutes and finally I told him that he should advertise his political views in the phonebook so clients “like me don´t get tricked into paying for your service.”
This personal experience highlights Bush´s uniqueness as politicians have rarely meant much to me on an emotional level. In 1999 George W. Bush was no exception to this rule as I knew little about him and had no reason to believe that he would be what he has now become. Perhaps my disgust with the Gore campaign and the negative media coverage of Bush began to forge a strong bond with the man or maybe it was due to the fact that I learned more and more about his qualities as time went by. I recall that during the unforeseen election crisis of 2000 I sat in bleary-eyed anticipation hoping that Bush would be declared the winner. When he was, after the Supreme Court´s ruling, I was filled with anxious optimism for the future. I have not been disappointed once in the time since.
We have reaped the dividends from a man who is strong enough to not be intimidated by having the best and the brightest as his subordinates. The media may portray Bush as being Cheney´s lackey, and although nothing could be further from the truth, it is very easy to imagine a man with Cheney´s gifts being a top flight Commander in Chief on his own. The same can be said of Donald Rumsfeld who was presented to us as an old relic from the Ford Administration but he never was in the eyes of George W. Bush who had the foresight to see him as the man of tremendous ability and skill that he is. Bush has not been threatened by the independence or brilliance of his Secretary of Defense and we have been the benefactors of such security. The same can be said of his choices of Condoleesa Rice and Colin Powell. Either of them may one day be our President but certainly Bush´s assurance with himself allowed him to hire two such competent subalterns without a fear of them upstaging him in the eyes of the public.
On the policy side, other than the steel tariffs, I cannot think of one thing that Bush has done since he was elected that I disagree with. Oh, surely, like most on the right, I wish he went farther in this direction or that but Bush has backed the best policies possible considering how evenly divided the nation is. His initial tax relief package and the one he is proposing now are a powerful attack against the leviathan of government. His brief against affirmative action may not have gone far enough in our eyes but the fact that he took a position against it at all (“at their core, the Michigan policies amount to a quota system that unfairly rewards or penalizes perspective students, based solely on their race”) is a major achievement in comparison to past Republican Presidents who “grew in office” by turning to the left. He will surely avoid the leftward tilt that weakened the administrations of his father and Richard Nixon.
In my view, Bush´s most imperative contribution has been elevating the role of “Commander in Chief” to the most significant facet of the Presidency. At one time it was evident to everyone the importance of having an ever vigilant Commander in Chief but this function was forgotten and avoided during William Jefferson Clinton´s eight year “holiday from history.” Bush´s stand-off with the Chinese in April of 2001 showcased his direct approach to dealing with nations who are not automatically our friends. One shudders at the thought of what Al “Buddhist Temple” Gore would have said or done had he been in charge of our nation.
George W. Bush has reminded us why we have this unwieldy federal government. We don´t have a government to promote the Peace Corps. We don´t have a government to provide subsidies to special interest groups. We don´t have a government to pay some states to compete more successfully against other states. The reason that we have a federal government is to protect the people of the United States of America. We could call the United Nations but they´d never answer our calls. We could call France or Germany but they´d recommend the joys of subservience as a solution. We must defend ourselves or no one else will. Our government exists to protect us both at home and abroad. It took a man of Bush´s magnitude to restore defense as the fundamental justification for the bureaucracy that we spend so much for in Washington. Defending the frontier is why Bush is in the Oval Office today.
The days that followed the evil assaults of September 11th may well have been his finest moment. Bush seemed to know instinctually what had to be done and, unlike Clinton or Gore, it was not to sulk around the United Nations and have lunch and photo ops with Kofi Anon.
Bush has followed a precise trajectory since that dark day in September and America and the world has been the better for it. He could see what many pundits and tertiary politicians did not about the assault on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. He knew that America had a right and duty to react with force. His choice was legally and morally legitimate. The Public Interest recently documented this [Spring 2003, p.91]
By all the accepted standards of international law, and under the terms of the United Nations Charter, the attacks of September 11 were acts of war. The United States, as a sovereign state, had a fundamental right to defend itself.
As always, Bush ignored the whimpering of the chattering classes and moved swiftly to eliminate the viability of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Thanks to George W. Bush our enemies now know that simmering, smoky, third world graves await those who viciously murder Americans. Hopefully, Saddam Hussein has just found this out for himself. What more can we ask from a leader other than to act decisively and with wise forethought? Not much I´d argue. George W. Bush has exceeded all possible expectations aside from those he may have had for himself.
The fanatical hatred of Mr. Bush by the leftist media and Hollywood has only endeared him to me more. They foolishly berate him for not being an intellectual but it would be impossible for any man who did not parrot leftist mumbo jumbo to be considered worthy by the press. A person´s disagreement with government intervention in the economy or the influence of the despicable welfare state is taken as de facto evidence of brain dysfunction by the media. I can definitively state, as some one who has administered over 700 intelligence tests, that George W. Bush is absolutely at or above the Superior range of functioning. Obviously his skills and abilities lie in the top quartile of our population by any one´s estimation. His achievements, Yale undergrad and a Harvard MBA are dismissed as being due to his “connections” but Al Gore, “the genius”, had just as good of connections and achieved no where near the same results as Bush academically.
Ultimately, the arguments about intelligence and just how intellectual a President should be are specious. Intelligence certainly is important to leadership but so is character, decisiveness, and emotional stability. Richard Nixon´s personality problems plagued and ultimately ended his Presidency regardless of the shimmer of his intellect. Jimmy Carter´s intellectual gifts did not in any way mitigate his indecisiveness as a leader and his profound pessimism regarding the future of our American enterprise. Bush also manifests the qualities of “emotional intelligence” that Goleman argued are integral to success in life than the more traditional form of general ability that we think of when we describe a person´s cognitive potential.
My title includes the word “hero.” What does it take to be a hero? Isn´t leading your people and restoring their security and greatness essential to any such definition of a leader of men? His enemies spitefully call him a ‘cowboy´ but there is one representation of a cowboy from western genre that does accurately depict the figure of the 43rd President. It's Clint Eastwood´s portrayal of the preacher in the film Pale Rider where an underestimated man comes along to a small mining community and saves nearly all from disintegration and death.
Bush has done the same for all of us. He has had made us wave the flag and proudly say the pledge again which alone contributes volumes to our renewed viability as a national entity and is not compatible with national disintegration.
We´ve seen how little the world cares about us, yet the story that has not been covered is just how much George W. Bush cares about the rest of the world. How many would be in near-slavery today were it not for him? He has freed the Afghans and the Iraqis from unspeakable horrors. As one Iraqi said after we liberated his town “My life begins today.”
The world owes a great deal to this “cowboy” as do you and I.
Mr. Bush, if you should ever read this, I say to you sincerely that my own confidence for the future of our nation began on January 20, 2001 which was the day you were inaugurated President of the United States of America. I, like historians will be a hundred years from now, am forever grateful to you.
To comment on this article or express your opinion directly to the author, you are invited to e-mail Bernard at bchapafl@hotmail.com .
We're the Reagan Generation, sir...and just as the WWII generation won the war against Fascism and just as the following generation won the Cold War against creeping Socialism, so shall the Reagan Generation ROUT America's DemonRAT Left during our time in the sun.
The greatest world-wide danger to FReedom today is the Lib'ral American DemonRAT Left...however, they are demonstrably-WRONG and shall be DESTROYED as a viable political alternative within the next 10 years as Lib'ral DemonRATS achieve third-party status.
HOO the heck wants to be a Minion fer the EffeteElite anyway?! Unless yer part of the RAT Politboro, Lib'ralism's got nuthin' to offer!!
FReegards...MUD
Ah, you hit an issue I care a great deal about. ;-) Indeed. There is something called the "Tradition of American Liberalism", or Classical Liberalism, which is...basically what conservatism is now, and the EXACT opposite of current liberal doctrine.
Liberals co-opt these phrases without the slightest ideas of what they mean. Just as easily as they take Nazi or "Russia in the 1920s" and somehow...dunno what they're smoking, but give me some...feel these labels can be applied to modern-day America whilst keeping a straight face.
Classical Liberalism is...well, I won't use the French, I'll translate, heh: Liberty, Equality, and Universal Brotherhood. All of which the (current) liberals hate.
You are also right about a great deal of work needing to be done on the homefront -- I WISH I would hear "cap gains cut" or talk about a cap gains freeze if you're re-investing, cuz that's what really lit a fire under the American economy's butt the last time around. Subsiziding success and taxing failure, while it makes common sense, is the reverse of what the liberals want -- which means they want less success and more failure, basically, although they've argued themselves into believing that's not what they're talking about.
However, as for being "de-clawed" by multiculturalism...I speak as one who suffered through public education institutions that tried to shove all that crud down my throat repeatedly. It made me frustrated and more conservative -- and I wasn't the only one -- and this was at UC *Berkeley*. When I took a tour of Stanford, the #1 question on every prospective student's lips was, "Is the PC as bad as I hear it is?!?!" Mark my words -- human nature is human nature, and PC runs counter to human nature, and eventually there is a backlash. I think the backlash has already begun.
That being said, the tradition of America as a melting pot -- "true" multiculturalism, as I would dub it -- seems to me, anecdotally, to be gaining steam once again, as it should.
In other words, they tried to declaw us, and they declawed a lot of us, but those of us with claws left look at the domesticated poodles of the left...and we start sharpening OUR claws immediately.
And I, for my part, will do my very best to make sure that faith was not placed in vain! Thank you.
This Bush Administration is one of the few times in history that we have had a group of truly top-flight people working as a team.
Good commentary.
I was thinking along similar lines in that Bush is and has been at his best. He expects his top people to be at their best and leads by example. Striving to be at their best on the job at hand is what gives them real power and effectiveness. Politics is off the radar screen in their personal realms. They do have to deal with foreign politics and politics inside our own government. It appears that the way they have done that is to say, "okay, we'll try it your way for awhile. You have important roles to add and we want to hear what you have to add."
Those that have something of substance and value to add are welcomed aboard. Others that show that their true colors are self-serving political agenda had their chance and made their choice. So be it.
It seems that rendering oneself -- be it an individual, government or organization -- irrelevant is almost contagious. But it's not. Certain people and groups have built their own-house-of-cards illusions and can't manage to get out of the way of themselves fast enough. We've witnessed it with the United Nations security council, certain Democrats, president Chirac and the French government and to somewhat lesser extent the German and Russian government.
Lets not forget that many media outlets are their own worst enemies. Two of the three big three networks, ABC and CBS, despite historical reference that shows they gain about 10% more viewers during big news stories have lost about 15% of their audience. Most of them picked up by FOX which serves twenty million fewer homes and the Internet.
They could get a lot done.
Gotta love it. George W. Bush is one shrewd poker player.
Got that right. My son in college tells me many of his liberal friends have turned and said flat out they are voting for Bush and many Republicans. Seen the same thing with my middle son and his high school buddies. All are seniors, avid Fox news watchers and have the most fun debating the liberal fools in Gov't classes.
When we see many college libs starting to turn, I can only imagine what's happening with the older fence sitters. The RAT socialists and their Hollyweird/Media buddies will have gotten us more votes than Rush Limbaugh could ever hope to do. No disrespect meant to El 'Rushbo at all. It merely proves his point....they do us more good than anybody.
Keep that pen and paper churnin' Mud, we'll get Slick yet.
Good observation, but you'll never hear it from the press, at least not with proper emphasis or prominence.
Remember the transition? The press trapped themselves on that one with their own spin. Having predicted deep difficulties for an administration of questionable legitimacy attempting to govern a deeply divided nation, they were then forced to acknowledge the stunningly deft transition, and report the opinions of policy experts who hailed it as the most successful transition in the history of the modern presidency. As a bonus, many reminded their interviewers that the most successful transition previously had been that of Reagan, and that The Rapist's transition was inept and plagued with difficulties.
The press clearly hated having to report on this. The funny (and deeply satisfying) thing about it all was they might have been able to ho-hum their way past acknowledging this first notable accomplishment of the administration if they had not been so over the top in poisoning the atmosphere previously.
Still, some of the press did largely ignore the transition story, and those that didn't spun it explicity as being due to Cheney's deft management (which, one must admit, was proper attribution, except for the, "Bush is dumb, Cheney is the smart one," subtext) and spun it implicity as Bush being a lucky idiot, at best benefiting intially from an easy going (and stupid) geniality.
The full story was amost never told, and as proof I doubt even most FReepers ever heard it: How, when the press was portraying Bush as fecklessly idling at the ranch, Cheney had his transition team doing a highly detailed and penetrating study of previous presidential transitions, including exstensive interviews with dozens of key figures. They produced a thick study from this research, focusing on what had worked and what hadn't. The resulting insights were used to construct a transition plan for Dubya's administration that systematically layed out philosophy, priorities, procedures and responsibilities and that averted the usual confusions. Everyone was clear on their roles, there was minimal fuss, and Team Bush hit the ground running.
I've always felt that those who've claimed Bush "grew in office" after 911 just weren't paying attention early one. It was clear to me from day one (as much as it possibly could be) that this would be an exceptional presidency.
Nope ! Nor do I think he likes his student, Saddam, either ! . . .
But don't worry about the conservative support personnel in Hollywood. When I become President, I too will give the Ba'ath Party 48 hours to get out of California. That oughtta give your friends enough time to head for the hills before the bombing starts. ;^)
since you mention the war, i couldn't resist posting these, hehehe ! . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.