Skip to comments.
Quebec Elections: Liberals cruising to majority government
CBC News ^
| 14 Apr 2003
| CBC News
Posted on 04/14/2003 8:42:40 PM PDT by July 4th
MONTREAL - CBC News predicts a Liberal majority government in Quebec, making Jean Charest the next premier of the province.
It is Charest's first victory as leader of the provincial party after stepping down as leader of the federal Progressive Conservatives.
The Liberals defeated the ruling Parti Quebecois and Bernard Landry; and Mario Dumont's upstart Action Démocratique du Québec.
All three party leaders won their ridings.
In his concession speech, Landry thanked party supporters and congratulated Charest.
"I have to congratulate very warmly the leader of the Liberal party who has conducted his troops to a very impressive victory which was owed to them," said Landry.
Speaking to dejected supporters, Dumont vowed to continue developing the party's relationship with English speakers in the province.
Prime Minister Jean Chrétien expressed his satisfaction with the vote, reading the results to guests at a state dinner in the Dominican Republic. The prime minister is there on an official visit.
"Between Mike Weir and Quebec we have two good things," said Chrétien.
Charest's campaign focused on health care. He promised to cut government subsidies, tax credits to big businesses and trim the civil service. Charest also predicted Parti Quebecois leader Bernard Landry would call another sovereignty referendum of elected.
TOPICS: Canada; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adq; canada; charest; chretien; dumont; election; imbciles; landry; lpq; plq; pq; quebec
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
"Between Mike Weir and Quebec we have two good things," said Chrétien.
Chrétien went on to explain that he had no idea what "two good things" were actually between Mike Weir and Quebec.
But seriously, Canada is one step further away from removing the cancerous cyst that is Quebec.
1
posted on
04/14/2003 8:42:40 PM PDT
by
July 4th
To: July 4th
How is getting rid of Quebec helped by defeating the separatist party?
2
posted on
04/14/2003 8:43:59 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
To: All
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Thanks Registered
3
posted on
04/14/2003 8:44:16 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: July 4th
All three party leaders won their ridings.So what exactly does that mean? I'm somewhat ignorant when it comes to parliamentary style governments. Also, could you explain which party is liberal, moderate, nutty green, etc.?
To: gcruse
How is getting rid of Quebec helped by defeating the separatist party?
It isn't. That's what I said - Canada is one step further away from being done with Quebec.
5
posted on
04/14/2003 8:48:26 PM PDT
by
July 4th
To: Diddle E. Squat
Who cares how it works; let tarrif these fools out of existence and steal their diamonds, oil, and large cedar...
6
posted on
04/14/2003 8:49:32 PM PDT
by
Porterville
(Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
To: Diddle E. Squat
So what exactly does that mean?
I believe a "riding" is just another word for constituency. So it means that the leaders of the three main parties all won their home districts.
7
posted on
04/14/2003 8:50:17 PM PDT
by
July 4th
To: July 4th
Duh. Learning to read was one thing, understanding what I read is becoming something rare.
8
posted on
04/14/2003 8:51:56 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
To: July 4th
Great, that's all we need here in Vermont - a rabidly French nation directly north of our border.
Oh, wait, we already have that. Never mind....
Seriously, I do wonder what the implications for defense, trade, border security, etc. would be if Quebec did secede.
Personally, I would prefer it just drop into the center of the earth. Then we can push Nova Scotia a little to the left and attach it to Ontario.
LQ
To: Diddle E. Squat
Also, could you explain which party is liberal, moderate, nutty green, etc.?
Can't help you much there, besides the fact that the PQ (separatists) lost pretty badly. I have heard that the ADQ - yes, the tiny little third party - is the closest thing the Quebecois have to a conservative party.
10
posted on
04/14/2003 8:55:47 PM PDT
by
July 4th
To: July 4th
Isn't that like predicting a liberal will win in San Francisco? The only choice being Democrat liberal or Green liberal.
11
posted on
04/14/2003 8:58:15 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: Bogey78O
Yeah, it looks like the ADQ won't even get 20% of the vote, which I just read is what they need for official party status. (They're at 18% and only 4 seats.)
12
posted on
04/14/2003 9:00:03 PM PDT
by
July 4th
To: Bogey78O
Actually we in the US are oddballs in using "liberal" to mean "far left."
The party further to the Right won this election, the "Liberal" party.
13
posted on
04/14/2003 9:00:08 PM PDT
by
John H K
To: July 4th
Thanks for the explanation.
To: July 4th
Charest is a fiscal conservative and this landslide win is a huge move to the right in Quebec, away from the separatistes. The liberals in quebec spell a distinct attitude for change from the status quo in Canada, and one which could translate into a dramatic change in the federal government as well.
15
posted on
04/14/2003 9:02:43 PM PDT
by
albertabound
(It's good to beeeee Alberts bound.)
To: July 4th
Why is this news? Did anybody expect different? No politics in Canada matters at all. They sold their soul for the Euro-whore Chretien. There will be no redemption for that act of evil.
To: montag813
It is news because this election sets a revisionist tone in Canadian politics, a dramatic shift to the right in Quebec portends a rejection of the socialistic trends Canadians have been saddled with under status quo governments over the past 10 years. If we are to cohabitate this great continent with French Canadians, a more US and English Canada friendly administration in Quebec is a definite improvement and bodes well for the future.The separatistes are out on their asses, Chretien and his trained seals are next.
17
posted on
04/14/2003 9:10:49 PM PDT
by
albertabound
(It's good to beeeee Alberts bound.)
To: LizardQueen
Vert - Green. Mont - Mountain. It is too late.
18
posted on
04/14/2003 9:11:03 PM PDT
by
ijcr
To: Diddle E. Squat
A riding is an electoral district. A candidate has to be elected first and get to Parliament to become a Minister, like a Secretary. So someone runs for his local riding and is chosen the Prime Minister to run the country. He selects his Cabinet of Ministers from MP's, Members of Parliament.
There is no seperate Executive branch of Government but there is a seperate Judicial Branch.
This system can be very efficient and get many things 'done' unlike the U.S. system which can be slow and cumbersome most of the time. This system works well when everyone in parliament is working for the betterment of the counrty.
The down side is that the ruling party can outlaw the opposition. Look to many former British colonies in the African continent.
19
posted on
04/14/2003 9:31:53 PM PDT
by
X_CDN_EH
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson