Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813
"O)k, so vote against him, genius.

Ok, I will. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still getting evil. With the current situation, the next armed revolution is just around the corner, and if the so-called conservatives are just taking us there a bit slower, I say 'Let's just get it over with and move on.'

Those who would continue to vote for their 'lesser of two evils' candidate are the definition of insanity, ie, doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

How many times do you have to hit your head against the wall?

974 posted on 04/16/2003 3:02:00 PM PDT by wcbtinman (Metus improbos compescit, non clementia. (Fear, not kindness, restrains the wicked.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies ]


To: wcbtinman
I'd say were voting against one evil, not two. I would say we'd be voting for GOOD vs. evil. I would not in any way classify Bush as an evil man or even standing for evil principles.
976 posted on 04/16/2003 3:05:29 PM PDT by diamond6 ("Everyone who is for abortion HAS been born." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies ]

To: wcbtinman
Those who would continue to vote for their 'lesser of two evils' candidate are the definition of insanity, ie, doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

Now I m thinking you are a D.U. plant...here using Hillary Rodham Clinton's oft-quoted favorite expression.

1,277 posted on 04/17/2003 7:54:23 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson