[okiesap]

Those who will be too angry to vote for Bush 43 will be cutting their noses to spite their faces. Presidents have got to move close to the middle to have any chance at winning an election. The sad fact is you don't have to have a grasp of the importance of the 2nd Amendment to cast a vote. You don't have to have any intelligence whatsoever. Voters in 2004, like voters before them, will vote on the candidates charisma rather than issues. That anyone with the knowledge and understanding of the evils of liberalism emboddied by opportunists like Ms. Rodham would sit on or throw away a vote is beyond my comprehension.

[Byron_the_Aussie]

..those who will be too angry to vote for Bush 43 will be cutting their noses to spite their faces...

True, so let's hope the President never forces them to make that call.

Perhaps Bush 41 could give him the benefit of his experience?

[Mulder]

Presidents have got to move close to the middle to have any chance at winning an election.

This is liberal crap spewed by democrats, RINOs, and the media.

In the last 30 years, conservatives have done very well in elections (Reagan in 80 and 84 and Newt in 94). Liberals have had their clocks cleaned in landslides on several occasions, while you have to go back 40 years to find the last time a hard-core conservative was defeated at the national level.

"Moving to the middle" may work for the demoncrats, since they are trying to portray themselves as conservatives, but it doesn't work too well for Republicans when they try to act like liberals by "moving to the middle".

[poet]

I am Not a one issue voter!

There are many reasons I will not vote for him in 2004, not the least of which is his obcene spending of our tax dollars.