Skip to comments.
U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq
CNN ^
Posted on 04/14/2003 11:40:17 AM PDT by epluribus_2
KARBALA, Iraq (CNN) -- U.S. troops have found 11 mobile laboratories buried south of Baghdad that are capable of biological and chemical uses, a U.S. general said Monday.
There were no chemical or biological weapons with the containerized labs, which measure 20 feet square. But soldiers recovered "about 1,000 pounds" of documents from inside the labs, and the United States will examine those papers further, said Brig. Gen. Benjamin Freakly of the Army's 101st Airborne Division.
"Initial reports indicate that this is clearly a case of denial and deception on the part of the Iraqi government," Freakly told CNN's Ryan Chilcote. "These chemical labs are present, and now we just have to determine what in fact they were really being used for."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: illegalweapons; judysad; lab; tomsad; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
...Powell said the evidence included firsthand accounts from four sources -- among them, an Iraqi chemical engineer who supervised one of the facilities and an Iraqi civil engineer "in a position to know the details of the program."
Powell to DeVillPain/Blix: "Will you please SHUT THE HELL UP, NOW?"
To: All
2
posted on
04/14/2003 11:43:09 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: epluribus_2
We should drive one onto Hans' front lawn.
3
posted on
04/14/2003 11:43:33 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: epluribus_2
(more posturbation) "The trucks and train cars are easily moved and are designed to evade detection by inspectors," Powell said. "In a matter of months, they can produce a quantity of biological poison equal to the entire amount that Iraq claimed to have produced in the years prior to the Gulf War."
Was this the Iraqi madman's strategery? Destroy all weapons but keep the means to develop them hidden well to quickly rearm as soon as the UN inspectors "completed their work" and humiliated the US and UK? Then place calls to Al-Qaeda, et al to come get the goodies for a practically untraceable connection to the terror war on the West?
To: epluribus_2
Consider the source
6
posted on
04/14/2003 11:46:17 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: Badabing Badaboom
20 feet square is different from 20 sq ft.
20 feet square is 20 x 20 x 20.
7
posted on
04/14/2003 11:47:03 AM PDT
by
ladtx
("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
To: epluribus_2
Interesting that CNN seemed to be leading the pack with WMD stories since the confession in the NYT on Friday. They're sort of like former smokers relenting endlessly for their former addiction.
To: Badabing Badaboom
20 feet square is 20 X 20 or 400 square feet.
20 sqare feet is 4' X 5'.
But 20 feet square doesn't sound right either since moving an object 20' X 20' is not nearly as easy as moving a 10' X 40' object.
9
posted on
04/14/2003 11:50:53 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: choicenotecho
I'm getting a gnawing feeling about my last comment. If Iraq really destroy it's old stocks (maybe they were too old) but kept all the production capabilities as dual use items, then they could have it both ways - the axis of weasels will charge that Iraq was truthful (WE HAVE NO WMD!) and that quibbling about the trucks/labs/pesticide mixers is US/UK covering their Blixes. The leftwards leaning will buy it all, Bush will still his same supporters and the world and the US would end up politically where we started. Oh yeah, and "US allowed Saddam to Escape" echoing "US missed OBL" repeated until it is an urban legend that Saddam is alive they way Osama lives in the hearts of those opposed to Bush. Not to mention Osamaphonic tapes now from Saddam exhorting Arab street to continue war with US/UK/Joos.
To: Badabing Badaboom
>>>...
Is this correct? That's a tiny area (say 5 feet by 4 feet). Twenty feet square, not twenty square feet.
The order of words is important.
To: epluribus_2; *war_list; W.O.T.; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; NormsRevenge; Gritty; ...
12
posted on
04/14/2003 11:58:47 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: epluribus_2
The left will say those evil "SUV" labs buried themselves....
13
posted on
04/14/2003 11:59:28 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(I know what's best for you.)
To: Blood of Tyrants; Badabing Badaboom
20 feet square is 400 square feet, which I think is about the size of a tractor-trailer (about 8 ft by about 50 ft). This sounds about right for a mobile lab.
14
posted on
04/14/2003 12:02:26 PM PDT
by
Mitchell
To: ladtx
well, they could be two 10X20 foot trailers bolted together.. A la doublewides...
15
posted on
04/14/2003 12:02:31 PM PDT
by
tje
(Some mornings it's not worth gnawing through the restraints.)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: epluribus_2
17
posted on
04/14/2003 12:10:39 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(We have imprisoned them in their tanks -- Baghdad Bob)
To: ladtx
LOL, you overshot a bit: 20 feet square is 20 x 20 x 20.
18
posted on
04/14/2003 12:14:17 PM PDT
by
Eala
(irrelevant (î-rèl´e-vent) 1: The United Nations. 2: France. 3: CNN)
To: Badabing Badaboom
19
posted on
04/14/2003 12:24:19 PM PDT
by
TankerKC
(Operation Iraqi Liberation is complete.)
To: Badabing Badaboom
I certainly can't think of too many perfectly innocent reasons for burying eleven containers, regardless of the actual dimensions, along with about a thousand pounds of documents. From my old military supply experience I can say that I've heard plenty of buried property stories, none of them completely innocent.
By the way, I think by now someone knows the general nature of the documents recovered. It wouldn't take a good translator too long to skim through and have some idea whether these are surplus phone books, old duty rosters, or chem weapon tech manuals. I think CENTCOM and DoD will be very tight lipped about this one.
20
posted on
04/14/2003 12:24:50 PM PDT
by
Cap Huff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson