Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France says it will be pragmatic about postwar Iraq
Reuters | 4/14/03

Posted on 04/14/2003 7:55:26 AM PDT by kattracks

France says it will be pragmatic about postwar Iraq

LUXEMBOURG, April 14 (Reuters) - France said on Monday it would be "pragmatic" about postwar Iraq, setting aside differences with the United States over what exact role the United Nations would play in reconstructing the country.

"Let us be pragmatic, let us start from the reality of the problems," French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin told reporters during a meeting of European Union foreign ministers.

"It is in the interest of Iraq, the region and the international community," he added.

"It is obvious that the US administration has a role to play," Villepin said. "It is useless to go back to what divided us... let us turn to the future."

EU foreign ministers, meeting in Luxembourg, discussed what role the 15-nation bloc could play in the reconstruction of Iraq after the conflict as well as the role of the United Nations.

04/14/03 10:32 ET


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: france; littleredhen; postwariraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2003 7:55:26 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
pound le sand...
2 posted on 04/14/2003 7:56:19 AM PDT by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Is Pragmatic French for Absent?
3 posted on 04/14/2003 7:56:57 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Saddam's Hiding In Tikrit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Let's just ignore them. Let the french scream their little sissy boy heads off till their throats turns sore, and just continue ignoring them more. That would be their greatest punishment. They are 3 year old petulant children. They need a time out.
4 posted on 04/14/2003 7:58:53 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"let us turn to the future."

Too late--the train has already left the station and France missed the boarding call.

5 posted on 04/14/2003 7:59:05 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
DO YOU REMEMBER TOMMY ON ELECTION NIGHT

LET'S DO IT AGAIN IN 04

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

6 posted on 04/14/2003 7:59:07 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Back-peddle, back-peddle. Obfuscate.
7 posted on 04/14/2003 7:59:36 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"It is obvious that the US administration has a role to play," Villepin said

Dam Right! And France has one too! HEH HEH!

8 posted on 04/14/2003 8:00:31 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Is he dead yet? He's dead Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"let us turn to the future."

Seems to me that we made the turn and France went through the guard rail...

9 posted on 04/14/2003 8:00:41 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Groveling time! Just like the French though kissing @$$ when it is their benefit. How about leaving it up to the Iraqies on if they should be involved! Something says to me that a resounding NO will be voice by them.
10 posted on 04/14/2003 8:01:24 AM PDT by jedi150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Let us be pragmatic, let us start from the reality of the problems,"

Okay. Let's be pragmatic with omitting the problem of france from the equation.

11 posted on 04/14/2003 8:03:14 AM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Isn't it time for France to surrender again?
12 posted on 04/14/2003 8:04:57 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith

13 posted on 04/14/2003 8:09:39 AM PDT by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Good grief they've got some nerve. Perhaps post war power in Iraqi should be in proportion to $'s spent liberating Iraqi. How about by the number KIA?. Lets see, that gives france 0%. Sounds about right. Either way, the goal is to set things up and let the Iraqis run it themselves, and quickly. Then the Iraqi can & should decide how best to reward france for their service.....or not.
14 posted on 04/14/2003 8:11:00 AM PDT by mad puppy (We will be there for as long as it takes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Here's a 'roll' that France can play!

15 posted on 04/14/2003 8:37:27 AM PDT by Jambe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What I don't understand, is why France wants a role in Iraq
so bad. Then to say let's go back to the way it was a long
time ago. Like nothing has happened. Look toward the future. I for one can not be reconciled again with France,
Germany, Russia or French Canada for the rest of my life.
I will not forget. I need nothing from their countries.
I need none of their imports. If need be I will pay more for products just to keep them and their influence out of the U.S. I don't need or want their movies, food, drink, or their way of thinking or life. I don't need to speak their
language. If they want to talk to me use American language.
The most important is that right now this very moment we don't need any more of them coming to the U.S. to live.
The U.S. is the freest country in the world, and the world
knows it. The U.S. had to fight for that freedom. It was not given to us by the named above, so who are they to
talk ever about freedom. As for the protesters - learn your
history of the U.S. first before opening mouth. Your speech
was paid for not given to you. Also remember, The U.S. rules
by the majority not the minority. If you do not like the U.S. the way it is, then change it the way our forefathers
set it up to change in a civilized way or leave the U.S. and never look or come back. The time of the flag burning and bad mouthing has come to an end.
16 posted on 04/14/2003 8:39:09 AM PDT by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jambe
Chiraq and Villepin are deeply saddened and disappointed...
17 posted on 04/14/2003 8:41:45 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Keith
le pond scum
18 posted on 04/14/2003 8:42:49 AM PDT by BillCompton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
You know ... some of you people on these boards.

Yes, France will not have certain contracts such as but not limited to contracts in the oil fields. I expect the same to happen in Canada because of my Canadian government's crap stance too and rightly so.

But because of the enormous costs, America needs ALL countries it can muster to help build Iraq. America realized this just the other day ago when it along with the rest of the G7 (which included France) signed an agreement to send X billion dollars to repair Iraq.

I cannot believe that the American people would, by themselves, want to pay for the entire cost of restoration of a country all because the other countries stayed out of the war. This is especially so seeing these other countries are willing to contribute. Bush, as most of you on this board know, is not a stupid man. He knows he must keep his deficits down and even the cost of the war down. Sharing the costs works to his political advantage and that is what its all about.

So yes, American, British, Japanese and other companies do stand to have a big win here in rebuilding Iraq. But as America has now signaled at the G7, it welcomes the use other countries money and knowledge, including France, to help rebuild too.

hawk

19 posted on 04/14/2003 8:53:41 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hawkaw
Hawkaw--

Saddam has looted billions from Iraq. We have got our hands on some of it, we may find the rest. That will be a good start.

After that, Iraq can earn tens of billions of dollars a year pumping oil, only now it will all go to the people of Iraq and not to the criminal enterprise (including French oil companies) running the place.

There is no need for the US to have international help in administering Iraq, except as a sop to globalists in areas where they can't interfere too much, such as humanitarian relief. But I would prefer to fund reconstruction ourselves, as we did with the Marshall Plan, before I would ever agree to let the perfidious French and the duplicitous Russians anywhere near the place. Let them back, and intrigues that will doom democracy will come with them.

The hell with Canada, too. I'm for increasing our border restrictions on your people. Sorry. If you get a more responsible government, maybe after a few years, attitudes will change. But it will take genuine action on Canada's part that evidences that your government is not anti-US. Platitudes about having to work together won't cut it. We can make it without you, and without France, Germany, Russia and the UN, if need be. That fact may be what irks Old Europe the most--our independence from them and their bureaucratic meddling.

20 posted on 04/14/2003 9:19:31 AM PDT by Defiant (Iraqtion: That swelling pride that results from raising the staff of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson