|
|
|
 |
Donate Here By Secure Server
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
|
Posted on 04/14/2003 5:32:32 AM PDT by kattracks
Two in CNN Crew Hurt in Iraqi Gunfight
By DAVID BAUDER .c The Associated Press
NEW YORK (AP) - Gunfire erupted between Iraqi forces and a guard hired to protect a CNN crew, a development that made one media commentator worry about the risks of having journalists protected by armed escorts.
Correspondent Brent Sadler was driving through Tikrit, one of the last strongholds of Saddam Hussein loyalists, in a seven-vehicle CNN convoy Sunday when they decided to leave because they could feel ``hostility rising,'' he said.
They were fired upon with automatic weapons while just outside of Tikrit, he said. An Iraqi Kurd guard traveling with the CNN crew returned fire as the vehicles sped away.
The gunfight involving Sadler's guard was believed to be the first time armed protectors of a CNN crew had to use a weapon. Most journalists adhere to Geneva Conventions rules that reporters not openly carry weapons in war zones, although several news organizations have hired armed guards for protection in dangerous areas.
CNN repeatedly ran video of the incident on Sunday that showed the roadside passing by from the car's perspective, then the sound of rapid-fire guns and the camera being pointed to the sky as its operator ducked for cover.
``These shots weren't intended to scare us,'' Sadler later said. ``They were intended to kill us.''
The guard was grazed by a bullet, said Matthew Furman, CNN spokesman. A CNN producer was hit by shattered glass.
CNN noted that Sadler was in a convoy clearly marked as containing journalists and that the Iraqis fired first. In a dangerous place for reporters, CNN supports what its guard did, Furman said.
While not passing judgment on what happened, media ethics expert Bob Steele said news organizations must consider the danger that such an incident can heighten the risk for all journalists that they will be considered a hostile force in a time of war.
``It may be a justifiable risk,'' said Steele, director of the ethics program for the Poynter Institute for Media Studies. ``But it's a risk that must be considered on the front-end before a dangerous situation takes place and potential consequences play out.''
Joel Campagna, Mideast program director for the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, couldn't recall another incident where a reporter's guard had to fire his weapon.
``Journalists pose the question of whether they should sacrifice their security for the perception of neutrality. I don't know the answer to that,'' he said.
It was the second harrowing experience for a CNN correspondent near Tikrit in three days. On Friday, correspondent Kevin Sites and his crew were held captive for several hours by Iraqi Fedayeen at a checkpoint.
Sites and his crew were accused of being American spies and threatened with death. His hands were bound behind his back and an AK-47 round fired at his feet. They were released after negotiations between the crew's translator and village elders, he said.
On the Net:
Poynter Institute for Media Studies: http://www.poynter.org
04/14/03 08:24 EDT
|
|
|
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
|
I had serious questions with the whole thing. First of all there was the danger; would we see a live murder on TV? Then, there was the aspect of causing a real problem for secret troops in the area. And, something that would've seemed improbable then... it could've messed up that release of the POWs.
Can TV reporters be court martialled?
This is what I typed in an earlier thread about this. I didn't realize they actually were endangering military personnel in this idiocy. I'd rather see our military guarding hospitals and museums, and let the snipers go for these idiots.
Coincidence? After the NYT letter from the CNN honcho? My guess is fabricated.
I wonder what they will be saying when a US soldier fires on them. Were I in an American outpost and saw these yahoos chasing around in a caravan of trucks, I'd think Syrian/Palestinian/etc paramilitary and open fire. Then what?
A 120mm tank round or two might make their stupidity sufficiently obvious so perhaps even they could finally see. There are no directors, no groomers, no voice coaches on a battlefield, one "take" is all you get. And "it's a wrap" refers to bodybags.
I kinda get the impression these guys are hoping for some shooting, it makes for better footage don'tcha know. Given it was CNN, they probably feel friendly fire would be even better. Then they could replay the Hotel Palestine event of several days ago.
Most journalists adhere to Geneva Conventions rules that reporters not openly carry weapons in war zones, although several news organizations have hired armed guards for protection in dangerous areas.CNN faces (and reports this time!) Iraqi thuggery.... bump
Only a journalist would worry about the danges of being in a war and HAVING a gun.
Game over, Man!
LOL - good one...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.