Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi nuclear scientist surrenders
The Daily Telegraph ^ | April 14, 2003 | Neil Tweedie

Posted on 04/13/2003 5:55:01 PM PDT by MadIvan

One of Iraq's top nuclear scientists has surrendered, the US said last night, in another bonus for the coalition as it attempts to locate Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.

The surrender of Jaffar al Jaffar followed that of Saddam's most senior scientific adviser, Lt Gen Amer al-Saadi, in Baghdad over the weekend. Jaffar had turned himself in over the past few days in Iraq, a US official announced yesterday on condition of anonymity.

He added that Jaffar "certainly would know about locations of nuclear-related facilities, and also would know a lot of people associated with Iraq's nuclear program, as well as likely other aspects of the WMD [weapons of mass destruction] programme".

"Hopefully he will be more forthcoming and candid than he has been to date." Al-Saadi, an expert on chemical and biological weapons, was being interrogated yesterday after handing himself over in front of the crew of a German television station.

In the television interview before he was taken away, Al-Saadi, the former head of the ministry of military industrialisation, maintained that Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction.

However, an American intelligence source in Baghdad said Al-Saadi was expected to know where weapons were hidden, how many of each type were produced and the possible whereabouts of Iraqi weapons scientists.

Ewen Buchan, spokesman for the UN inspections team, said: "He's a really big fish. But who knows whether he will tell them anything, or just stick to his guns."

There have been no confirmed discoveries of WMD in Iraq so far, despite American and British assertions that they exist. US marines yesterday said they had discovered 278 artillery shells in a school yard that contained substances that tested positive for chemical agents, but further analysis was needed.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alsaadi; bioterrorists; biowarfare; blair; bush; iraq; iraqifreedom; jaffaraljaffar; saddam; scientists; surrender; uk; us; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: MadIvan
It's amazing what having 300,000 determined weapons inspectors in Iraq can accomplish.

I notice that we Anglos aren't having the same problem with getting interviews alone with top Iraqi scientists.

U.S.: 2
U.N.: 0

21 posted on 04/13/2003 6:17:18 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B
I'd really like the see the Germ Lady in the bag.

Yes. Actually, there are 2 Germ Ladies. One is Taha, can't remember the other one.
22 posted on 04/13/2003 6:19:23 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: arasina
It may be that this he is his public statement so as to protect himself and his family. He may still be afraid that they could be hunted down later (mafia style). Hopefully off the cameras he says all.
23 posted on 04/13/2003 6:34:41 PM PDT by Bellflower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B
"I'd really like the see the Germ Lady in the bag."

No Kidding!
24 posted on 04/13/2003 6:37:47 PM PDT by Bellflower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Badabing Badaboom
If Saddam wasn't sending him to Syria with the rest - why leave him alive?

He can be Operation Paperclip-ed. We need him and it's perfectly publicly acceptable to give him something close to asylum. I doubt he's going to end up in a War Crimes court. But we can't let Saddam, Uday, Qusay and Aziz off the hook, so any deal would give them a different status. If there is a deal then they must either disappear forever (not on the loose, of course), or they must show up somewhere where we would have a face-saving excuse for not insisting on their extradition. Everything will be much easier once we have cleaned up in Iraq -- the benefits will be so great, any bad aftertaste caused by Saddam showing up in, say, Belarus, will be quickly forgotten. But, if that is the scheme, it would have to be finessed. I don't doubt that it could be managed, though.

26 posted on 04/13/2003 6:58:58 PM PDT by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan
I can't help but wonder what's under the mosques.
28 posted on 04/13/2003 7:40:45 PM PDT by skr (The Butcher of Baghdad is? a WMD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Looks like those cards became Saddam's hit list and these guys are looking for protection.
29 posted on 04/13/2003 8:35:50 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (mnGod Bless Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Yes. Actually, there are 2 Germ Ladies. One is Taha, can't remember the other one.

Taha is Dr. Germ. The other is Mrs. Anthrax. I don't remember what Mrs. Anthrax's real name is, but she was the woman visible in the b&w video of Saddam and cronies that was shown on Iraqi tv a couple of weeks ago.

30 posted on 04/13/2003 10:11:52 PM PDT by laz17 (Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan; Badabing Badaboom; Allan
Interesting that this guy and al-Saadi have surrendered, when they could have just run away. Was this part of the deal?

Well, I don't know anything about these guys, but maybe they just don't have the personality to accept hiding underground for much of the rest of their lives. They probably also figure that they'll live a much more comfortable life after surrendering to the Americans than they would under any other scenario. They'll have to spill some of the beans, of course.

I don't think this implies any sort of deal with Saddam. It's the kind of thing you would expect to happen anyway.

31 posted on 04/13/2003 11:18:53 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"Assuming that Saddam does not have a nuclear program, why would he had a nuclear scientist?"

Because they USED TO have a nuclear program. But they dismantled it!
32 posted on 04/14/2003 12:12:15 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson