Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
It's called sarcasm. Soldiers understand that terrible things happen in combat. Decent men understand that these burdens should be shouldered by men and not women.

It is natural for chivalrous men to be more offended at the death of a woman, especially when it only serves to further a gender-bending feminist cause and the Democrats desire to weaken our military.

11 posted on 04/13/2003 2:21:31 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe
The choice of the disparaging term "Cannon Fodder" is equally puzzling. These troops were in a support unit. That's not the usual meaning of "Cannon Fodder".

These women were doing an adequate job of being "supply clerks". There's nothing indecent, futile or dishonorable in that.

The author reveals he is a cad by implying that their service (and in one case death) were somehow dishonorable for themselves or for our armed forces.

Again, there is something odd in his entire presentation, something hidden and perhaps unspeakable. I just can't put my finger on it.

17 posted on 04/13/2003 2:39:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Well said.
77 posted on 04/13/2003 4:40:02 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson