Skip to comments.
Petroleum Tank Blast in Texas Kills Four teenagers(Palestine, Texas)
http://www.kansascity.com ^
| 4-12-03
| OXENinFLA
Posted on 04/13/2003 9:06:47 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
Petroleum Tank Blast in Texas Kills Four Associated Press
PALESTINE, Texas - A petroleum tank exploded as five teenagers were standing on top of it, killing four, authorities said.
Three of the teens were pronounced dead Friday night at the scene of the explosion in the Long Lake area, about 10 miles west of Palestine in eastern Texas.
A fourth died Saturday afternoon at a hospital where she was airlifted following the blast, which occurred about 10 p.m. Friday. A fifth was treated for minor injuries and released.
Authorities said the blast threw some of the teens between 50 and 75 yards away, police said. The tank, owned by Key Production Company Inc., had about 6 inches to a foot of oil in the bottom.
Investigators were trying to determine what ignited the blast.
A witness said he saw flames shoot up about 100 feet in the air. Vernel Smith, who lives about a mile from the scene, said she felt her house shake.
"It rocked my house from front to back," Smith said. "I thought my water heater had exploded or something."
Lt. Chuck Franklin said the teenagers were camping at a cabin with their grandfather Friday night, and at some point went for a walk and ended up at the tank.
(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: _Jim
MY bad, propane petroleum does it really matter? they both make for a big boom
To: Pern
Those tanks are designed to breathe.
So yes, there would be some level of fumes on top of the tank.
My gut tells me that this was a smoke break with a very bad location chosen to do it.
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
propane petroleum does it really matter?Investigation-wise and determing just WHAT quite literally sparked this explosion - YES IT DOES!
As to idly passing words on a website - no ...
23
posted on
04/13/2003 9:29:39 AM PDT
by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: MEG33
How about a spark from a shoe tack+ fumes. I guess that's possible, but highly improbable.
24
posted on
04/13/2003 9:32:25 AM PDT
by
Pern
To: OXENinFLA
Those poor kids may have read too much Stephen King and did a Trashcan Man act that went wrong.
To: _Jim
well I am sure it matters for the investigation. but I think I can solve it quite quickly. Teenagers got on top of a petroleum tank and whatever they did (light a cig, build a fire, throw rocks at it) whatever it was it was dumb
To: Pikachu_Dad
So yes, there would be some level of fumes on top of the tank.
The tank, owned by Key Production Co. Inc., had about 6 inches to a foot of oil in the bottom, Deputy Franklin said. "When there is oil there is always gas mixed in with it," he said, adding that probably gas vapor was venting out of the top of the tank.
27
posted on
04/13/2003 9:34:23 AM PDT
by
deport
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
well I am sure it matters for the investigation. You bet it does - look down the road and consider the liability aspect regarding inevitable lawsuits that spring up ...
28
posted on
04/13/2003 9:38:40 AM PDT
by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: MEG33
To state the obvious. Kids today are granted "rights" to do just about anything they want, and then the parents wonder why things like this happen. (I have some relatives who would probably laugh at their kids standing on top of a tank.....and say, "oh, it's alright....leave them alone."
29
posted on
04/13/2003 9:41:07 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(CNN...the MOST TRUSTED in News......by CRIMINALS!)
To: goodnesswins
but it seems the gene pool has been cleaned up a little.....
1) Cruel comment. They were teenagers. Teenagers are ignorant and notorious for believing that they are impervious to harm. 2) There is a HUGE difference between ignorance and stupidity.
30
posted on
04/13/2003 9:42:31 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
(Democrats... united as ever in opportunism and error.)
To: Clara Lou
Thanks.
31
posted on
04/13/2003 9:44:24 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Bigg Red
C'mon, were you not a little stupid at 14 or 15? Now it's universally know that all teenagers know everything, just ask one. =)
But at 14 or 15 I knew well enough what explosive gases were and not to bring any type of flame close to them.
I feel terrible for the families, this is a horrible this to read. But I'm guess it was something one of them did to cause the explosion.
To: Pern
I guess that's possible, but highly improbable. Considering they were probably close to vents, tank full of fumes, it might have been something as small as a static electic shock. Not improbable at all.
To: Bigg Red
C'mon, were you not a little stupid at 14 or 15? I know I was. Are you serious????
I was a "little" stupid at 15 when my friends and I got busted for toilet papering someones house.
These kids were NOT a little stupid they were VERY STUPID.
End of story.
My prayers go to the families for loss of these young STUPID kids.
34
posted on
04/13/2003 9:50:28 AM PDT
by
MotleyGirl70
(If you like the French raise your left hand, if you ARE French raise both hands!!!!!!!!!)
To: Clara Lou
Yes, you are right. My point is that their "ignorance" comes from their parents desire not to "teach" them. I see it all the time. Yes, the comment was cruel.....but not as cruel as their deaths. If someone had really cared they wouldn't have let them mount the oil "can."
35
posted on
04/13/2003 9:50:48 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(CNN...the MOST TRUSTED in News......by CRIMINALS!)
To: OXENinFLA
Somehow I don't think they were just standing on it. Why not? There was one that surrived, I'm guessing that's where the info came from.
There is very little new production around Palestine, so that tank has probably been sitting there for years, sometimes empty, sometimes full, without exploding.
Then it "coincidentaly" exploded while the teens were on it?
I don't think so.
So9
36
posted on
04/13/2003 9:51:38 AM PDT
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: Clara Lou
1) Cruel comment. They were teenagers. Teenagers are ignorant and notorious for believing that they are impervious to harm. 2) There is a HUGE difference between ignorance and stupidity.Bravo.
If anyone wants to point fingers, how about all of the adults who build dangerous facilities and then don't secure them. If a teenager can wander into a facility like that and set off an explosion by accident, someone with malice could easily do the same on purpose.
To: goodnesswins
If someone had really cared they wouldn't have let them mount the oil "can."Herein comes the liability aspect - was the compound properly fenced off to prevent intruders - was the lock or gate breached for entry by persons attempting to gain entry ...
38
posted on
04/13/2003 9:54:48 AM PDT
by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: OXENinFLA
not wanting to bet, just a little suspicious...
the coincidence of factA (the tank exploded) and factB (the kids were atop it) plus the general factC (that oil tanks do not explode spontaneously on a regular basis) and general factD (14-15 year olds are prone to commit stupid actions) suggests that one or more of these kids triggered the explosion.
This is probably a case for the Darwin Awards.
39
posted on
04/13/2003 9:55:22 AM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: Anchoragite
If a teenager can wander inHerein lies an assuption that remains yet to be proven ...
40
posted on
04/13/2003 9:55:43 AM PDT
by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson