[RusIvan]

You are a pre-recorded digital machine. I hope your device melts down.++++

I'm not machine. I got your points and I will think over them. I'm sorry if I disappointed you.
I simply not beleive anyone from instant I have to think it over.

For all here this about Russia is just theory, for me - real practice. I remember all the process of writing of new constitution. I remember those questions you put up today. It isn't new for me. They was widely discussed in Russia.
Common resume was like I said the civil rights wasn't granted but supported.
Still I will think it over again.

[VRWC_minion]

Common resume was like I said the civil rights wasn't granted but supported.

How can an entity protect something it doesn't control ? What you fall prey to is clever wording to disguise a relationship.

Think in terms of your own property. In order to "protect" something you have to have control over it.

Face it you swallowed and are still swallowing propoganda. Our constitutions are founded under diamtrically opposed relationships. That is why the difference in shall and shall not.