Replies

Are you serious? Those of us who are outraged with CNNs admission don't need to "lighten up". You need to get some moral fiber. You think moral culpability starts/ends with telling the government? What about personal accountability? Why do you think CNN should be absolved from moral and ethical behavior. It's nonsense to say that CNN had no other choice than to perpetuate lies for 12 yrs. Ill-informed nonsense and typical of liberals' defense when confronted with unethical actions. CNN took the easy way, the expedient way, out of a difficult moral dilemma. They could have closed up shop in Iraq, removed their staff from harms' way, and written their expose 12 yrs ago. Why didn't they? Simply because they cared more about getting a oneup on the other networks and making money.

"...CNN took the easy way, the expedient way, out of a difficult moral dilemma. Why...? Simply because they cared more about getting a oneup on the other networks and making money..."

They had one other MAJOR reason: If they told the truth, it would benefit GWB (and the republicans in the 8 years of the Clinton morasse). And that was something that they would not do at ANY expense.

God, I hate the Clintons and what they tried to do to this country!

Bla bla bla bla bla bla.
Hope you never have to take action that will get your employees killed. Apparently it wouldn't weigh on your conscience either.
Bla bla bla bla glad your moral fiber is so fibrous.