I would like to know what companies are providing this technology. Software providers, Data-mining, ERP, intrusion detection & alert, etc.
1 posted on
04/11/2003 11:08:59 AM PDT by
Pro-Bush
To: All
"Please contribute to FreeRepublic and make these posts go away"
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar! Thanks Registered
|
2 posted on
04/11/2003 11:10:54 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Pro-Bush
According to Dyer, the system won't scan "irrelevant" personal information about Americans, such as medical records, but could consider records of over-the-counter drug purchases, which could indicate planning of a bioterrorist attack. And just how are they gonna get THIS data?
3 posted on
04/11/2003 11:11:32 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
To: Pro-Bush; Fred Mertz; Remedy
"We're testing our hypothesis on nothing but synthetic data." That should be quite interesting - developing a set of assumptions and then developing a set of test data containing data that matches those assumptions to see if the data models can detect patterns. I'm SURE our terrorist enemies will be this considerate when they leave their data trails for TIA to detect. "Dammit, Achmid, quit being so rude! Don't pay cash for that! Use your credit card so TIA can spot it!"
4 posted on
04/11/2003 11:14:22 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
To: Pro-Bush
"Three thousand people died on 9/11. When you consider the potential effect of a terrorist attack against the privacy of an entire population, there has to be some trade-off," Dyer says. Didn't Mr. Franklin have something to say about that?
31 posted on
04/11/2003 12:18:48 PM PDT by
B Knotts
To: Pro-Bush
Lt. Col. Doug Dyer, a program manager at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa), said at an IBM-sponsored conference on data privacy in Almaden, Calif., this week that Americans must trade some privacy for security. That's because you're a s**t eating, freedom hating bureaucrat Doug.
32 posted on
04/11/2003 12:21:34 PM PDT by
AAABEST
To: Pro-Bush
35 posted on
04/11/2003 12:27:06 PM PDT by
OXENinFLA
(Welcome to the beginning of 1984!)
To: Pro-Bush
"Three thousand people died on 9/11. When you consider the potential effect of a terrorist attack against the privacy of an entire population, there has to be some trade-off," Dyer says. Forget that the FBI could have stopped those guys beforehand. Use it as an excuse to violate the 4th amendment rights of every American. Notice how they take away liberty in the name of security, but they don't GUARANTEE security? There is no promise, no accountability.
Disgusting. Forget 'Give me liberty or give me death'. Now it's 'Take away my liberty, just tell me it'll all be OK.'
To: Pro-Bush
The so called "Mark of the Beast" evangelicals have been screaming about? (my comment posted for the tin foil crowd-which ain't looking too crazy these days).
51 posted on
04/11/2003 2:11:25 PM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Pro-Bush
A "Hell" Bump
56 posted on
04/11/2003 4:35:45 PM PDT by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist)
57 posted on
09/09/2003 8:38:46 PM PDT by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson