Skip to comments.
U.S. Nuke Find Claim in Iraq Critiqued
AP via Yahoo News ^
| 4/10/03
| William J. Kole
Posted on 04/10/2003 7:29:51 PM PDT by marshmallow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: All
There's A Better Way To Beat The Media Clymers (And You Don't Have To Skate)!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/10/2003 7:36:31 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: walkingman
Sounds to me like someone's trying to cover their ass and explain away what our troops found. Radiation? what radiation?
To: marshmallow
"ElBaradei said the inspectors should return as soon as possible, subject to Security Council guidance, to resume their search for banned arms"
...return as soon as possible ... subject to Security Council cover up, er guidance..."
Not No, but HELL NO!
5
posted on
04/10/2003 7:39:32 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
To: marshmallow
this isn't a smoking gun for the same reason the artillery shells weren't.
The UN had already seized and sealed it years ago
To: marshmallow
I'm really F'n tired of the UN.
To: marshmallow
"But an expert familiar with U.N. nuclear inspections told The Associated Press that it was implausible to believe that U.S. forces had uncovered anything new at the site. Instead, the official said, the Marines apparently broke U.N. seals designed to ensure the materials aren't diverted for weapons use or end up in the wrong hands."
Ah... more 'experts'. I tell ya folks, that word should raise a red flag every time you read it unless there's an actual qualification for their expertise (aka, a CURRENT general, not a retired one).
8
posted on
04/10/2003 7:44:54 PM PDT
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
To: marshmallow
"Instead, the official said, the Marines apparently broke U.N. seals designed to ensure the materials aren't diverted for weapons use or end up in the wrong hands."
Okay, here's my problem with this. If these "seals" were so great, why is it that our Marines had no problem supposedly breaking them? Sorry, but sealing it up isn't a comfort to me. Sounds like a load of crap to me.
To: Let's Roll
Let him return, please!
And since he's so convinced there's nothing radioactive there, encourage him to inspect wherever he likes, without a protective suit.
To: marshmallow
I'm no nuclear scientist but it sure seems to me that this stuff would be a great source for dirty bombs. I guess the UN had Saddam's word that he would always use this nuke 'waste' for only peaceful purposes....
11
posted on
04/10/2003 7:50:48 PM PDT
by
telebob
To: RaiderRose
I think the purpose of seals was merely to ensure that the things had not been opened, not to physically prevent the opening.
I don't trust the UN either, but I do trust Jed Babbin:
The news that the Marines discovered Saddam's nuclear weapons--including weapons grade plutonium--under the old nuke site at al-Tuwaitha seems too good to be true. Like most things that do, it probably is. Dr. Khidir Hamza was the head of Saddam's nuclear weapons program for nearly two decades. He told me today that he's very skeptical. If he is, so am I.
Dr. Hamza worked at al-Tuwaitha for twenty-four years. The site, very close to the Tigris River, has a very high water table, making underground construction very hard, but not impossible. When you dig you get a well not a tunnel. When Dr. Hamza left there in 1994 no massive tunnel complex existed. It is possible that Saddam built a massive underground site for nuclear weapons development since then, but probably not at that site. Saddam is (was?) too clever to have undertaken such a project in a spot that is so closely watched. A big dig like the one required for such a big project would, as Dr. Hamza said, almost certainly have been detected by satellites or even by the U.N. inspectors who were very active there.
Dr. Hamza--the only guy I know who has had eyeball-to-eyeball and nose-to-nose contact with Saddam--doesn't believe the Marines found anything more than what may have been left behind by the U.N. inspectors. Even Chief U.N. Inspector Hans Clouseau, and his sidekick al-Baradei, couldn't miss radiation as intense as is being reported. We should wait for more to believe we have captured Saddam's nuke program.
To: telebob
I'm getting the impression that the UN & Saddam had frequent orgies.
13
posted on
04/10/2003 8:10:10 PM PDT
by
crobnson
To: marshmallow; *war_list; W.O.T.; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; NormsRevenge; Gritty; ...
14
posted on
04/10/2003 8:10:33 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
To: marshmallow
They said the U.S. troops may have broken U.N. seals meant to keep control of the radioactive material. WHY DOES THE UN HAVE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN IRAQ?
15
posted on
04/10/2003 8:12:07 PM PDT
by
ez
(...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.)
To: marshmallow
the Marines apparently broke U.N. seals designed to ensure the materials aren't diverted for weapons use or end up in the wrong hands. If this material can be diverted for weapons use, then what the heck is it doing in Iraq? If this material is capable of being processsed into weapons grade nuclear material then this IS the smoking gun!
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
I am starting to believe we will not find a thing. By the time we got there the guy had every track covered.
17
posted on
04/10/2003 8:13:50 PM PDT
by
Minty
To: ContentiousObjector
this isn't a smoking gun for the same reason the artillery shells weren't. The UN had already seized and sealed it years ago
So are you telling us that while the UN was telling us that Iraq had no fissionable material, they actually did, but the UN "sealed it up?"
18
posted on
04/10/2003 8:14:12 PM PDT
by
ez
(...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.)
To: ez
We should be interrogating the UN to find out what else they know. The UN has had a really bad history and this is starting to show that there is more there. How do we get rid of them? Or at least refill their seats with people who have true morals?
19
posted on
04/10/2003 8:18:49 PM PDT
by
crobnson
To: Minty
I am wondering myself.
Let's see.........there have now been probably near 10 false alarms.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson