Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Administration Describes Secondary Role for U.N. in Iraq
NYTimes ^ | 4/10/03 | DAVID STOUT

Posted on 04/10/2003 1:25:33 PM PDT by RJCogburn

The Bush administration made it clearer than ever today, in sketching its vision for a democratically run Iraq, that it sees a decidedly secondary role for the United Nations in that country when the shooting is over.

"The U.N. can be an important partner," Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

But he quickly added that he hoped the international organization could play "a much more positive role in the future" than it has in the past.

"And I think there's reason to think that it can and will," Mr. Wolfowitz went on. "But it can't — it can't be the managing partner. It can't be in charge. We need to make sure that certain functions are working smoothly from day one, and I think the goal should be to pass that responsibility as quickly as possible to Iraqis."

The deputy secretary envisioned an Iraqi interim authority, which he said would draw from all of the country's religious and ethnic groups, embracing people now in the country and those who are outside. Organization of that entity can begin almost at once, he said.

"It will provide a way for Iraqis to begin immediately to direct the political and economic reconstruction of their country," Mr. Wolfowitz told the lawmakers. "The authority would include not only members of the free Iraqi groups that have fought Saddam's tyranny, and the independents among the expatriate community, but will also draw from local leaders who have already begun to participate with the coalition in the liberation of Iraq."

The White House, too, said the Iraqis are already demonstrating their ability to govern themselves. "There is a town in western Iraq in which the mayor and the town council have already started working very closely with coalition forces," said Ari Fleischer, President Bush's chief spokesman. "They're beginning their self-governance once again."

As for the ground-breaking talks to set up a new national government in Iraq, Mr. Fleischer said Secretary-General Kofi Annan would be invited to send a United Nations representative. "He would be most welcome," Mr. Fleischer said.

Mr. Wolfowitz's theme at the Senate hearing, which could be rendered in short as "Iraq for the Iraqis," was not new. But the deputy secretary's comments were significant in view of the Bush administration's lingering dissatisfaction with the United Nations and its apparent failure, at least in President Bush's view, to rise much beyond the level of an international debating society.

The Pentagon official's comments could indicate continuing strong disagreement with Britain, which has been America's staunch ally in the war against Iraq but would like to see a stronger role for the United Nations afterward than Washington sees.

Mr. Wolfowitz said he strongly agreed with the committee chairman, Senator John W. Warner of Virginia, who said the main partners in the military campaign in Iraq — the United States and Britain — should manage post-war Iraq, at least in the early going.

"I think you're absolutely correct in that," Mr. Wolfowitz replied. "And I think what we are trying to avoid is a situation that we have seen in other places in the world where Iraq might become a sort of permanent ward of the international community. There's no reason for that to happen. This is a country that has every capability of administering itself, of handling basic functions, and I believe creating a viable government."

Mr. Wolfowitz did say he could see the United Nations helping in the very early stages, "when things like food and water and medicine and basic services have to be delivered." But in saying that, he portrayed the United Nations as a giant charitable and relief organization rather than a governmental entity.

Mr. Wolfowitz also made it clear that Washington's relations with France, which opposed the campaign in Iraq, may not be smoothed over quickly. The deputy secretary took the opportunity to talk about the French when the hearing turned for a moment to the subject of NATO enlargement.

"I agree the French have behaved in ways, particularly since we're here to talk about NATO, that have been very damaging to NATO," Mr. Wolfowitz said. "I think France is going to pay some consequences, not just with us but with other countries who view it that way. But I don't think we want to make the Iraqi people the victims of that particular quarrel."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: interimauthority; irrelevant; orha; postwariraq; un

1 posted on 04/10/2003 1:25:33 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
But in saying that, he portrayed the United Nations as a giant charitable and relief organization rather than a governmental entity.

A very elegant twist of the knife.

2 posted on 04/10/2003 1:28:27 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections

Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 04/10/2003 1:30:08 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
IMO UN doesn't even seem to be a very good aid organization. Since they had Aid workers on the ground in Iraq how did so many supplies brought in by the UN end up in warehouses and never distributed? The US should demand answers before having them do anything in Iraq!
4 posted on 04/10/2003 1:30:35 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; The Great Satan; TLBSHOW
But the deputy secretary's comments were significant in view of the Bush administration's lingering dissatisfaction with the United Nations and its apparent failure, at least in President Bush's view, to rise much beyond the level of an international debating society.

In your face UN dogs!

5 posted on 04/10/2003 1:31:17 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

UN Vulture Alert!

6 posted on 04/10/2003 1:32:06 PM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
the goal should be to pass that responsibility as quickly as possible to Iraqis.

Not to UN NGOs, to Iraq.

7 posted on 04/10/2003 1:35:04 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
bump
8 posted on 04/10/2003 1:35:33 PM PDT by buffyt (Hollywood celebrities, just like the French, actually think their opinions matter! Shuddup Chirac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Excellent. For the welfare of Iraq, we cannot turn over the building of a new government to an organization that 1) refused to enforce its own numerous resolutions against Saddam, 2) is dominated on the Security Council by nations that either militarily or commercially supported the Saddam regime, and 3) has a high proportion of nations that are run by dictators.
9 posted on 04/10/2003 1:39:57 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
There were reports of a toilet paper shortage, but I think the French can handle that part.
10 posted on 04/10/2003 1:40:47 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
"The U.N. can be an important partner," Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"Like, Kofi Annan could scrub urinals in Basra, or something."

11 posted on 04/10/2003 1:41:58 PM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
The UN is worthless and it is nice to see this story some what.

A better story would be the UN role is zip zero and we are leaving the UN and the UN has 30 days to vacant New York City and America!
12 posted on 04/10/2003 1:48:51 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Re#2 There is more than one turn of the knife in this interview. I like this Wolfowitz. Kofi & the UN clowns surely don't. I hope that W lets Wolfowitz take the point on assigning the UN a "very important" role. Hehehehe....
13 posted on 04/10/2003 1:50:01 PM PDT by eureka! (Bless our Troops and Allies and the freed Iraqis........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn

14 posted on 04/10/2003 1:53:39 PM PDT by WSGilcrest (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Somebody needs to clue in the NY Times. The U.N. will play an important role in Iraq. They will play a vital role. Repeat that over and over. Somebody has to pick up the clothes at the cleaners, take the dog to the vet, arrange the sock drawer. These things are important, and I object to the NY Times saying otherwise!
15 posted on 04/10/2003 1:55:17 PM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
"I agree the French have behaved in ways, particularly since we're here to talk about NATO, that have been very damaging to NATO," Mr. Wolfowitz said. "I think France is going to pay some consequences, not just with us but with other countries who view it that way. But I don't think we want to make the Iraqi people the victims of that particular quarrel."

Or continue TO BE victims of the UN, the Frenchies, the Germans, the Russians, or the Rats.

16 posted on 04/10/2003 1:56:57 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson