1 posted on
04/10/2003 10:24:53 AM PDT by
JustRight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: JustRight
Uh-oh. If true. It's worse than we thought.
2 posted on
04/10/2003 10:25:50 AM PDT by
ladtx
("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
To: JustRight
May I be the first to say, "Holy S**t".
3 posted on
04/10/2003 10:25:58 AM PDT by
Mr. Bird
To: JustRight
And El-Baradei (sp?) visited this joint, right?
4 posted on
04/10/2003 10:26:38 AM PDT by
ErnBatavia
(Bumperootus!)
To: JustRight
Paging Blixie....
5 posted on
04/10/2003 10:26:39 AM PDT by
appalachian_dweller
(Those who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.)
To: JustRight
At al Tuwaitha or however the heck it's spelled?
7 posted on
04/10/2003 10:27:00 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: JustRight
Plutonium? Yea right...it was planted. </sarcasm>
9 posted on
04/10/2003 10:27:44 AM PDT by
rface
(Ashland, Missouri)
To: JustRight
Next question...Has any of it left the premises
Last question....does it say "Made in France" on the label ?
10 posted on
04/10/2003 10:27:51 AM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: JustRight
The Fox babe just said that the Pentagon is watching this report.
Weapons Grade plutonium.
They can't make it. That leaves out-sourcing: Russia, France, China, Pakistan.
There's gonna be hell to pay.
Who's the FoxBabe?
12 posted on
04/10/2003 10:28:15 AM PDT by
peeve23
To: JustRight
Holy Crap!!! Any more details coming in? We are cubie bound here! Thanks!
14 posted on
04/10/2003 10:28:21 AM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Is he dead yet? He's dead Jim!)
To: JustRight
At least plutonium is more difficult to light off than highly enriched uranium.
17 posted on
04/10/2003 10:29:06 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: JustRight
If they did find this - good thing they did! (Good thing a democrat is not president!!! Whew! We'd all be toast!)
19 posted on
04/10/2003 10:29:22 AM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Anti-American protestors are inbread liberal Notsosmartso's.)
To: JustRight
Very series! This is hugh!
22 posted on
04/10/2003 10:29:52 AM PDT by
aught-6
To: JustRight
And of course, when General Brooks mentioned in yesterday's press briefing that they discovered missles with heat-seeking tips on them--in direct violation of the UN sanctions--the only thing the press could ask was: What about the Palastine Hotel? Huh? What about the Palastine Hotel? Are you targeting journalists now? Hhhmmm?
To: JustRight
This is not good.
26 posted on
04/10/2003 10:30:13 AM PDT by
kidd
To: JustRight
Carl Prine, the reporter who broke this story, is the one talking to Linda V.
Here's his story, and it's a big one:
Marines hold nuclear site
To: JustRight
Could this suggests that Saddam may have nukes ... and he's drawing coalition forces into a trap?
28 posted on
04/10/2003 10:30:18 AM PDT by
Z-28
To: JustRight
Han Blix response: A little plutonium has never killed anyone...
To: JustRight
That would explain the heavy duty radioactivity, not either type of Uranium.
FYI
U235 - hard to refine, easy to make a bomb
Pu239 - fairly easy to manufacture but hard to make a workable bomb
To: All
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Thanks Registered
To: JustRight
Oh no, it's worse than we thought!!!
37 posted on
04/10/2003 10:30:56 AM PDT by
adam_az
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson