Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton's performance viewed negatively in poll
Buffalo News ^ | 4/9/2003 | By DOUGLAS TURNER

Posted on 04/10/2003 2:33:14 AM PDT by NYpeanut

WASHINGTON - The job performance of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., is viewed negatively by a majority of New Yorkers, despite her being in the news almost daily on issues dealing with homeland security.

A new poll by Zogby International released Tuesday showed that those interviewed rated her performance as 47 percent excellent or good against 51 percent fair or poor. Only 2 percent of the 709 New Yorkers interviewed about Clinton on Thursday and Friday said they weren't sure about her.

The margin of error in the poll is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

When asked how they viewed Clinton generally, 55 percent said they looked on her favorably against 42 percent who said unfavorably. That result shows major slippage since the last survey taken Feb. 23, when she earned 62 percent positives against 35 percent negatives.

Clinton colleague Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., earned a 52 percent excellent/good score on his job performance versus 36 percent who thought his work was only fair or poor.

The results for Clinton were parallel to those reported on Monday by the Marist poll, which gave her work a 47 percent positive rating against 49 percent who saw her work negatively.

Upstate - which excludes New York City and its suburbs - gave Clinton a net negative of 21 points.

Upstaters, whose support was critical to her 2000 election victory, rated her work only 39 percent positive and 60 percent unfavorably. She did best in New York City - 62 percent positive and 35 percent unfavorable. But across the line in the city's suburbs, she rated only 43 percent positive against 54 percent negative.

Other than former Sen. Alfonse M. D'Amato during his final term, it is unusual for a New York senator's performance to be consistently viewed negatively.

Clinton's office declined to respond to a request for a comment.

James E. Campbell, political scientist at the University at Buffalo, said Clinton "has not been a major presence up here for quite a while."

"I don't know why her numbers should be moving that way - so little has happened," said Michael Haselswerdt, Canisius College political science professor.

Of Gov. George E. Pataki, the Zogby poll reported that 61 percent said it's time for a new governor, while 31 percent said he should be re-elected. Even so, Pataki enjoyed a 54 percent excellent/good performance rating compared to 46 percent who said it was poor or fair.

In theoretical matchups for the 2006 gubernatorial race, Pataki would still defeat Democrats Eliot Spitzer or Andrew Cuomo.

Bureau assistant Eric DuVall contributed to this article.

e-mail: dturner@buffnews.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonhaters; hillary; pollsoniraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Nice photo, mrs. co-rapist. It looks like it was taken in the morgue. Is that why your book is late?

1 posted on 04/10/2003 2:33:14 AM PDT by NYpeanut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
History of Free Republic


Click The Logo to Donate
Click The Logo To Donate


Thank You for Supporting Free Republic

2 posted on 04/10/2003 2:33:54 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
hillary-hating ping
3 posted on 04/10/2003 2:33:55 AM PDT by NYpeanut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
The Bard said it best: The truth will out.

Re the picture: It ain't the years...it's the mileage.
4 posted on 04/10/2003 2:37:05 AM PDT by jonesbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
During war time people tend to take off their rose colored glasses.

The underlining feeling of contempt about the co-rapist are coming to the surface.

They're a whole lot uglier than that picture.

5 posted on 04/10/2003 2:41:22 AM PDT by JZoback (Don't have such an open mind, your brain falls out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

"I don't know why her numbers should be moving that way - so little has happened," said Michael Haselswerdt, Canisius College political science professor.

It figures that a political science professor would miss it. People are reevaluating based on their own free will and chose not to let themselves be as easily manipulated by events outside of their control. It's a fundamental move towards honesty.

6 posted on 04/10/2003 2:43:03 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
HILLY the kid


7 posted on 04/10/2003 2:46:13 AM PDT by knarf (RA 11448419)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZoback; Zon
You both hit the nail right on the head.
8 posted on 04/10/2003 2:52:29 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
ping
9 posted on 04/10/2003 2:53:20 AM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
Wonder what her poll numbers would be if New Yorkers were told that her agenda for Homeland Security was to pull the rug out from under President Bush hoping for more terror.

This evil one has orchrestrated the next campaign by controlling who gets "MONEY" via the Homeland Security Agency. Who are the democrat base in setting up elections?

Union leadership whether it be state, city, county and local government are the backbone of who gets elected.

Union dues are the milk to keep Hillary's fedyaheen goons funded.

What Hillary is also attempting, to "appear" out of step with the communist so call peace protests.

New Yorker's seem to think that they are the smartest people on this planet and yet they voted for two of the biggest Clymer's on the planet.

10 posted on 04/10/2003 3:16:00 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
by the Marist poll

When I first read this, I thought it said Marxist poll. How appropriate. The pro-Hillary numbers are still way too high, IMO. 51% against is not good enough!

11 posted on 04/10/2003 3:20:17 AM PDT by arasina ("Thank you Mister Bush!" [direct quote from liberated Iraqi man])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Hitlery just keeps harping on more money for New York. Yesterday, Scummee, her boy, said they need more money for homeland security in Rochester & Buffalo.

Obviously, what they did just get for Homeland Security went to New York City only.

Scummee and Hillary have been to Rochester 3 times within a month where the Dem Mayor is busy trying to become king of the county. His statements make it obvious that Hillary will fund him. The Rochester City Council passed an anti-war resolution a while back and lo and behold, Hillary came to Town a few days later. She did make anti-war statements and this is how she did it.

12 posted on 04/10/2003 3:24:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
Upstaters, whose support was critical to her 2000 election victory, rated her work only 39 percent positive and 60 percent unfavorably

Better late than never.

13 posted on 04/10/2003 3:36:11 AM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

" Me? Negative ratings? They don't like me. They really don't like me."

14 posted on 04/10/2003 3:37:19 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *Clinton Haters
indexing
15 posted on 04/10/2003 3:38:30 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Not really. New Yorkers will probably re-elect her.
16 posted on 04/10/2003 3:54:06 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
Old Republicans are beginning to emerge. Put Guliani against Hillary in any capacity and it's a slam dunk for the Repubs. Sometimes, love for fireman and policeman who worked the 9-11 tragedy is more important than money. Lest we forget, Hillary never attended a funeral for the fallen and this was her home base. Non-yankee, go home!!
17 posted on 04/10/2003 4:00:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Rudy already had his chance to save New York from Hillary, and he blew it. New Yorkers will probably re-elect her.

18 posted on 04/10/2003 4:04:11 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
Upstaters, whose support was critical to her 2000 election victory, rated her work only 39 percent positive and 60 percent unfavorably. She did best in New York City - 62 percent positive and 35 percent unfavorable. But across the line in the city's suburbs, she rated only 43 percent positive against 54 percent negative.

What does this say about those "sophisticated" New Yorkers?

19 posted on 04/10/2003 4:09:46 AM PDT by monocle (ussia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monocle
......."sophisticated"???? Yeah right! Only Hillbillies and left wing Jews and Blacks vote for Hillary. Sophisticated???? I don't think so!
20 posted on 04/10/2003 4:13:09 AM PDT by Claire Voyant ((visualize whirled peas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson