Skip to comments.
Clinton's performance viewed negatively in poll
Buffalo News ^
| 4/9/2003
| By DOUGLAS TURNER
Posted on 04/10/2003 2:33:14 AM PDT by NYpeanut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Just mythoughts
Hillary's fadayeen are all the pathetic female losers whose only religious belief is the right to kill babies. Since it is highly doubtful that any of them will ever be pregnant, one can only suppose they don't want anyone else to have babies either. That women are responsible for putting democrats into office is truly shameful, and it gives the lie to any claim that women are the smarter sex.
To: Grand Old Partisan
Rudy found out that he had cancer, remember?? Decisions are tough. God had a plan and that would be that he would be in charge in NYC at the time of 9-11. He failed neither God nor man and Hillary's true colors "it's all about money" not people came through loud and clear.
22
posted on
04/10/2003 4:16:48 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!)
To: Sacajaweau
Rudy could have run for the Senate, taken his seat, then retained the option of resigning for health reasons, to be replaced by another Republican appointed by Governor Pataki. If it was God's plan to have Rudy in charge of New York on 9/11, what does that say for God's plan for the thousands of people killed that day?
To: Claire Voyant
One can only appreciate my comment if one call recall the New Yorker cartoon showing a New Yorker's view of the world.
24
posted on
04/10/2003 4:24:18 AM PDT
by
monocle
(ussia)
To: NYpeanut
"I don't know why her numbers should be moving that way - so little has happened," said Michael Haselswerdt, Canisius College political science professor. He sounds like the Arabs who believed the propaganda of Baghdad Bob and Al Jazeera rather than reality.
25
posted on
04/10/2003 4:25:30 AM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: jonesbear
The Bard said it best: The truth will out. Re the picture: It ain't the years...it's the mileage. Can you imagine what a drag it must be to be her! The joyless radical marxist-feminism which she has to hide as best she can from the public. When she is alone and quiet, what can appear to her to be the purpose of it all. It can't be an uplifting vision.
That's what I think of as the real mileage that will show through in her features.
26
posted on
04/10/2003 4:25:45 AM PDT
by
ontos-on
To: knarf
At first glance, I thought your Billy the Kid photo was actually of the woman who played the wickede witch in the Wizard of Oz.
27
posted on
04/10/2003 4:33:55 AM PDT
by
ontos-on
To: Grand Old Partisan
It is a testement to
Hillary!'s continuing "Star Power" that although Schumer's numbers are worse, and he faces re-election in '04 instead of '06, the story about this poll is all about
Hillary!.
I say one thing at a time. Let's liberate Chuckie's seat first, and depose one of the most anti-2A Senators, and worry about Hillary! in 2006.
28
posted on
04/10/2003 4:34:04 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(The Whizzo Chocolate Co. is pleased to announce that Crunchy Frog will soon be available again.)
To: Grand Old Partisan
He was being treated for prostste cancer. What did you expect him to do?
29
posted on
04/10/2003 4:37:47 AM PDT
by
em2vn
To: NYpeanut
Thanks for reinforcing why I will never live in New York again.
30
posted on
04/10/2003 4:49:02 AM PDT
by
anoldafvet
(Duty, Honor, Country: God Bless the U.S.A.)
To: NYpeanut
"I don't know why her numbers should be moving that way - so little has happened," said Michael Haselswerdt, Canisius College political science professor. Maybe NYers are getting tired of seeing her around. She brings back bad memories.
31
posted on
04/10/2003 5:03:00 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Saddam's latest message was a very simple one: ... --- ... ... --- ... ... --- ...)
To: syriacus
Wait!! I've got it....
She's just too "9/10".
32
posted on
04/10/2003 5:06:35 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Saddam's latest message was a very simple one: ... --- ... ... --- ... ... --- ...)
To: anoldafvet
You and me both. I vowed if Roidham won I'd be out of manhattantown and the state. She won in 2000, and I gave myself till the end of 2001 to leave. 9-11 actually delayed my escape from NY. I moved into my new apt in Las Vegas in late December, 2001, and completed my move in April,2001. I have never regretted it.
NY has one direction to go: DOWN.
33
posted on
04/10/2003 5:08:41 AM PDT
by
HitmanLV
To: NYpeanut
Until the figures are more in the direction of
2% good to tolerable
and
98% evil and intolerable,
her uhroyal lowness,
her hideous heinous--
Bwitch Shrillery
WILL STILL BE A
REAL AND PRESENT
DANGER TO THE REPUBLIC.
WE HAVE WORK TO DO, STILL.
34
posted on
04/10/2003 5:21:59 AM PDT
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: NYpeanut
Upstaters, whose support was critical to her 2000 election victory ...Nice spin, but upstate voted for Lazio. So did Lawn Guyland. Hillary's million vote margin in NYC got her elected.
To: Stay the course
Nice spin, but upstate voted for Lazio. So did Lawn Guyland. Hillary's million vote margin in NYC got her elected. But Lazio should have had that margin upstate (& central, don't forget central, everyone says upstate when they mean "north of the city"), and he didn't.
36
posted on
04/10/2003 7:10:06 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Yes, I DO have a page for everything on my site - movies, politics, khipu, Catholic novels . . .)
To: JohnnyZ
It's their own damned fault to be stuck with this corrupt fraud for their junior senator. If they don't like her, they need only look at themselves in the mirror.
That said, getting rid of Schumer is the next priority... 2004 comes before 2006.
37
posted on
04/10/2003 7:16:27 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: JohnnyZ
Do you think she came by her election honestly? Even considering Dem traditions in NY, her election didn't ring true. There's Pataki and Guiliani, after all. If she rigged her first election, could be that she might not be able to rig her second.
38
posted on
04/10/2003 7:19:30 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: NYpeanut
Very fitting that this comes from the Buffalo News.
No slam on buffaloes.
39
posted on
04/10/2003 7:21:12 AM PDT
by
lodwick
(Cheers)
To: sarcasm
She did best in New York City - 62 percent positive and 35 percent unfavorable.Figures.
40
posted on
04/10/2003 7:50:13 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(I know what's best for you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson