Skip to comments.
Clinton's performance viewed negatively in poll
Buffalo News ^
| 4/9/2003
| By DOUGLAS TURNER
Posted on 04/10/2003 2:33:14 AM PDT by NYpeanut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
![](http://www.buffalonews.com/graphics/2003/04/09/0409senator_mrln.jpg)
Nice photo, mrs. co-rapist. It looks like it was taken in the morgue. Is that why your book is late?
1
posted on
04/10/2003 2:33:14 AM PDT
by
NYpeanut
To: All
2
posted on
04/10/2003 2:33:54 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Liz
hillary-hating ping
3
posted on
04/10/2003 2:33:55 AM PDT
by
NYpeanut
To: NYpeanut
The Bard said it best: The truth will out.
Re the picture: It ain't the years...it's the mileage.
4
posted on
04/10/2003 2:37:05 AM PDT
by
jonesbear
To: NYpeanut
During war time people tend to take off their rose colored glasses.
The underlining feeling of contempt about the co-rapist are coming to the surface.
They're a whole lot uglier than that picture.
5
posted on
04/10/2003 2:41:22 AM PDT
by
JZoback
(Don't have such an open mind, your brain falls out)
To: NYpeanut
"I don't know why her numbers should be moving that way - so little has happened," said Michael Haselswerdt, Canisius College political science professor.
It figures that a political science professor would miss it. People are reevaluating based on their own free will and chose not to let themselves be as easily manipulated by events outside of their control. It's a fundamental move towards honesty.
6
posted on
04/10/2003 2:43:03 AM PDT
by
Zon
To: NYpeanut
HILLY the kid![](http://www.buffalonews.com/graphics/2003/04/09/0409senator_mrln.jpg)
7
posted on
04/10/2003 2:46:13 AM PDT
by
knarf
(RA 11448419)
To: JZoback; Zon
You both hit the nail right on the head.
To: b4its2late
ping
9
posted on
04/10/2003 2:53:20 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: NYpeanut
Wonder what her poll numbers would be if New Yorkers were told that her agenda for Homeland Security was to pull the rug out from under President Bush hoping for more terror.
This evil one has orchrestrated the next campaign by controlling who gets "MONEY" via the Homeland Security Agency. Who are the democrat base in setting up elections?
Union leadership whether it be state, city, county and local government are the backbone of who gets elected.
Union dues are the milk to keep Hillary's fedyaheen goons funded.
What Hillary is also attempting, to "appear" out of step with the communist so call peace protests.
New Yorker's seem to think that they are the smartest people on this planet and yet they voted for two of the biggest Clymer's on the planet.
To: NYpeanut
by the Marist pollWhen I first read this, I thought it said Marxist poll. How appropriate. The pro-Hillary numbers are still way too high, IMO. 51% against is not good enough!
11
posted on
04/10/2003 3:20:17 AM PDT
by
arasina
("Thank you Mister Bush!" [direct quote from liberated Iraqi man])
To: sarcasm
Hitlery just keeps harping on more money for New York. Yesterday, Scummee, her boy, said they need more money for homeland security in Rochester & Buffalo.
Obviously, what they did just get for Homeland Security went to New York City only.
Scummee and Hillary have been to Rochester 3 times within a month where the Dem Mayor is busy trying to become king of the county. His statements make it obvious that Hillary will fund him. The Rochester City Council passed an anti-war resolution a while back and lo and behold, Hillary came to Town a few days later. She did make anti-war statements and this is how she did it.
12
posted on
04/10/2003 3:24:50 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!)
To: NYpeanut
Upstaters, whose support was critical to her 2000 election victory, rated her work only 39 percent positive and 60 percent unfavorablyBetter late than never.
To: NYpeanut
![](http://home.earthlink.net/~dare2b/hillary.jpg
)
" Me? Negative ratings? They don't like me. They really don't like me."
14
posted on
04/10/2003 3:37:19 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: *Clinton Haters
indexing
15
posted on
04/10/2003 3:38:30 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: NautiNurse
Not really. New Yorkers will probably re-elect her.
To: Grand Old Partisan
Old Republicans are beginning to emerge. Put Guliani against Hillary in any capacity and it's a slam dunk for the Repubs. Sometimes, love for fireman and policeman who worked the 9-11 tragedy is more important than money. Lest we forget, Hillary never attended a funeral for the fallen and this was her home base. Non-yankee, go home!!
17
posted on
04/10/2003 4:00:31 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!)
To: Sacajaweau
Rudy already had his chance to save New York from Hillary, and he blew it. New Yorkers will probably re-elect her.
To: NYpeanut
Upstaters, whose support was critical to her 2000 election victory, rated her work only 39 percent positive and 60 percent unfavorably. She did best in New York City - 62 percent positive and 35 percent unfavorable. But across the line in the city's suburbs, she rated only 43 percent positive against 54 percent negative.What does this say about those "sophisticated" New Yorkers?
19
posted on
04/10/2003 4:09:46 AM PDT
by
monocle
(ussia)
To: monocle
......."sophisticated"???? Yeah right! Only Hillbillies and left wing Jews and Blacks vote for Hillary. Sophisticated???? I don't think so!
20
posted on
04/10/2003 4:13:09 AM PDT
by
Claire Voyant
((visualize whirled peas))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson