Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Participation - Charlie Reese: Anti-American Poison!
Focus ^ | 9 april 2003

Posted on 04/09/2003 8:49:10 AM PDT by steplock

Charlie Reese - Anti-American Poison
Date Wednesday, April 09 @ 08:08:34
LIES - RUMORS - and REESE
reeseking

A mixture of Outright Lies, leftist Psychological babble talk, half-truths, and rumor mongering. Charlie Reese is trying his best to destroy the morale of the United States military and make the Americans feel that they are the "evil-doers" of the world.

"...a mercenary Army, and that's what an all-volunteer Army is, despite all the rhetoric used to disguise that fact."

"Today we have a large standing Army of paid professionals whose profession is killing whomever they are ordered to kill."

NO PARTICIPATION

The war in Iraq is like all the wars since 1945. The burden is being borne entirely by members of the military and their families. The rest of us go right on with the good life as if no war was even taking place.

This is wrong, though I'm not exactly sure how to fix it. It has always seemed to me that when soldiers go to war, the whole country ought to go to war. In other words, each of us should do something to contribute. Instead of cutting taxes, Congress ought to levy a war tax. That would be a novel idea — to actually pay for a war as we fight it, instead of adding the cost to the already-unpayable public debt.

That would also disconcert the chicken hawks and other neoconservatives who want tax cuts and a war, too.

Years ago, an old Marine general by the name of Smedley Butler suggested that the minute war breaks out, all of the defense and armaments industries should be nationalized and all of their owners and workers drafted and paid the same wages that are paid the military. There is a great deal of merit in that idea, because it's repulsive to think that some Americans are making big profits out of a war that is killing young men who, even if they lived, could never hope to be rich as the CEOs of the war industries.

I've always had to part company with my libertarian brothers and sisters on this issue, because I think we made a big mistake in going to an all-volunteer Army. Granted, the old system — with plenty of outs for rich kids and those with influential parents — was no good. What I've always advocated is universal military training, with no exceptions for anybody. In other words, I prefer the good old citizen Army.

Nobody in Washington favors that, except perhaps Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y. They like the all-volunteer Army because it becomes, so to speak, a Roman legion of mercenaries. The politicians can send these legions anywhere, and most people back home don't give a damn, because their loved ones aren't in uniform. It is much easier for the politicians to abuse and misuse a mercenary army than it would be for them to do so with a citizen army.

There are, nevertheless, certain dangers of employing a mercenary Army, and that's what an all-volunteer Army is, despite all the rhetoric used to disguise that fact. History shows that it is conceivable that soldiers, loyal only to their own, could turn against the citizens who employ them. One man took a survey of Marines in California, and, if I remember the number correctly, 27 percent answered "yes" to the question "Would you fire on American civilians who refused a government order to give up their firearms?" Think about that, my friends. Those were military tanks that knocked down the walls and pumped tear gas into the compound at Waco, Texas. More than 90 American civilians died in that assault by the U.S. government.

And think, too, about the fact that America never suffered from a military coup because, until relatively recently, we never had an all-volunteer force. The military could seize control of the American government any time it wished to do so. One battalion of Rangers could make short work of the Washington police and Secret Service. One should never fall into the trap of thinking that just because something has not happened, it can't happen.

When Jimmy Carter was president and had practically dismantled our armed forces, I was working closely with a retired four-star general, Lewis Walt, a man justly called a Marine's Marine. Gen. Walt still had all of his clearances and was frequently in and out of Washington. He confided to me one day in a very worried tone of voice that for the first time in his long career, he had heard scuttlebutt about the possibility of a coup if Carter were re-elected. He wasn't, so we will never know if there was anything to the scuttlebutt.

Just remember that the most intelligent people ever to run the American government — our Founding Fathers — were bitterly opposed to a large standing Army. Today we have a large standing Army of paid professionals whose profession is killing whomever they are ordered to kill.

The URL for this story is:
http://www.gohotsprings.com/focus/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=390


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: marines; propaganda; reese
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: steplock
Someone needs to go to Charlie Reece's home and look for pods. His attitude and columns have changed greatly in the last three years. He may need a medical exam to make sure he hasn't had a stroke.
21 posted on 04/09/2003 10:00:06 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob
"I quit reading Sobran after 911 also! Great minds think alike. Ha-ha"

Unfortunately, poor minds tend to think alike, too- like quite a number of these anti-Semitic columnists (not all of them from the loony Left, either) who think that the U.S. Government is secretly run by a cabal of Jews.

Especially when everyone KNOWS it is really run by a mean mess of Methodists from Minnesota...

Oops, time to take my medication.

22 posted on 04/09/2003 10:43:53 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: steplock
He has spoken like he has never been in the military.

WHAT A JACKASS!
23 posted on 04/09/2003 11:25:47 AM PDT by Ebony-Patriot (Freedom isn't Free.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astounded
Reese is a very conservative (in a lot of ways resembles a libertarian, though he specifically states he is not one) columnist who wrote for the orlando sentinel up until a couple of years ago. He used to be very popular on FR, though I think many readers haven't found his new web home yet, and his almost obsessive hate of the israelis and support of the palestinians has doubtless cast a pall on his formerly supportive readers on FR.

His previous columns are worth a read...you will find that on any issue besides israel and the invasion of iraq he is way to the right.

http://reese.king-online.com
24 posted on 04/21/2003 3:09:37 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson