Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
That's odd because I've never had that problem (re: pharmaceuticals).

Only because you presented a government-approved prescription issued by a government-approved doctor to a governement-approved pharmacist. Any thing else is illegal.

[z]
43 posted on 04/11/2003 10:34:12 AM PDT by zechariah (Dangerous Jesus Lover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: zechariah

Yes, but as I said, I haven't been *denied* any pharaceuticals, thus, I am free in that regard as well as in others.

You seem to be headed towards a very old, long-since disproven argument, so let's get it out in the open so that the temptation to hide behind it subsides.

To wit: you can disingenuously say that you aren't free to drive anywhere that you want because legally, you are forbidden from driving down the wrong way on a 1 way street, but in reality, you can get where ever you want to go by simply following the rules.

You see, having to follow rules does NOT ipso facto mean that you aren't free. Anarchy is not freedom, but rather anarchy binds everyone to the law of the jungle where the strong prey on the weak as they see fit.

46 posted on 04/11/2003 10:40:24 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson