Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUTRAGE AT JOURNALIST DEATHS
New York Post ^ | 4/09/03 | Post Wire Services

Posted on 04/09/2003 5:18:21 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:13:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

News organizations demanded answers from the United States yesterday after U.S. fire killed three journalists in Baghdad.

Journalists from Reuters news agency, Spain's Telecinco and Arab TV channel al-Jazeera died after a U.S. tank fired on a hotel packed full of journalists, and airstrikes hit Jazeera's offices, prompting calls for an investigation.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: casualties; iraqifreedom; killed; warcorrespondents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: kattracks
Can you say the ministry of information of Bagdad has tentacles in our media?
21 posted on 04/09/2003 5:56:06 AM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
News organizations said this was not enough.

I have questions about paid human shields for Saddam.

22 posted on 04/09/2003 5:57:02 AM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
When the press expresses more outrage over journalists who could have walked away from the firing than they do over what happened to executed American soldiers, you know exactly where their priorities are.

The pathetic behavior of the press through much of this war has made the impossible possible: I loath the media even more than I did.

23 posted on 04/09/2003 5:57:57 AM PDT by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"While U.S. officials have expressed regret for the loss of life in these attacks and stated that they do not target journalists, they have left the impression that they bear no responsibility for protecting journalists

And the media tells us Saddam Husseins bears no responsibility for this. So obviously they are going to filibuster this and not show off the real culprits - them and their friend Saddam.

24 posted on 04/09/2003 5:58:29 AM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edskid
When the press expresses more outrage over journalists who could have walked away from the firing than they do over what happened to executed American soldiers

Yep, it's called filibustering.

25 posted on 04/09/2003 5:59:19 AM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
Journalist Shields

"Oh wow with this telephoto lense I see a 120 mm round coming this w..."

26 posted on 04/09/2003 6:01:49 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"It's hard to believe this was just a mistake. We want proof this was not a deliberate attack on journalists," said Severine Cazes, head of the Middle East desk at Reporters Without Borders.

'Round these parts, we prove guilt, not innocense. Considering all the sniper activity in that hotel, its a wonder the whole thing wasn't leveled.

27 posted on 04/09/2003 6:02:26 AM PDT by meyer (how do I turn this thing off?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We want proof this was not a deliberate attack on journalists," said Severine Cazes, head of the Middle East desk at Reporters Without Borders.

And I want my own personal Concorde.
I'll let you know when I get it.

Moron!

W-A-R
Reporters Without Borders = reporters without a pulse.
Don't they have dictionaries in Europe?

28 posted on 04/09/2003 6:15:14 AM PDT by Publius6961 (p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retrofire
Christiane Amanpour's diatribe on CNN's website about "proportional respose" nearly made me choke on my tongue.

Miss Piggie hasn't figured out that, in a war, the only ones entitled to define "proportional response" is the enemy?

29 posted on 04/09/2003 6:18:13 AM PDT by Publius6961 (p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I was just waking up and only half paying attention, but did I hear one of the questions at the CENTCOM briefing correctly? I thought one of the MANY questions was something like ... " a french reporter said there was no evidence of sniper frie from the hotel in the 30 seconds (did he really say seconds?) preceeding the tank fire."

Gee a whole 30 seconds of no fire?

And another one! Something to the effect of since the press are here at the Palestine Hotel is it going to be declared a 'historic' site (to prevent further fire) or some such.

REALLY, what about it's a war zone, it's dangerous, bullets and other ammunition will be flying...you're not embedded... you're on your own do they not understand?
30 posted on 04/09/2003 6:18:16 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Let me see if I understand ... US tanks aimed at a hotel "packed" with journalists ... and killed only three of them. No wonder Saddam was making fun of our army.
31 posted on 04/09/2003 7:19:03 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson