[ambrose]

The plea bargain came on the eve of a hearing to determine whether Strongsville police legally searched Kaforey's home when they seized evidence including videotapes and photographs of Kaforey engaging in sex with the girl and the boy, who was less than a year old.

Perhaps you read the article headline then immediately hit the reply button? If the evidence was excluded, he wouldn't get a life sentence. He wouldn't get an 11 year sentence. He'd walk free. That's why he got the plea bargain.

[DeepInEnemyTerritory]

Good point, I left that out of my rant. I wonder if there was just a small technicality regarding the legality of the search, or did the police just really screw up? Not enough information in this article to know.
Either way, this monster's actions are not in dispute and justice is not being served.

[EggsAckley]

No, I did NOT just read the headline; I always read articles to which I reply. I just re-read it for the third time, and it still doesn't make a lot of sense. Bungled justice, I suppose.

[El Gato]

He wouldn't get an 11 year sentence. He'd walk free. That's why he got the plea bargain.

I'd change that to "probably wouldn't get an 11 year sentence" and "probably walk free".

If it were for certain, his lawyer would never have agreed to the plea bargain.