Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Remember it was Scott Ritter who stated he had seen proof of Hussein's abusive conduct toward children, but tried to keep it quiet as he stated he was for peace, not war. I'm sure I saw that article posted here but don't remember a title.
16 posted on 04/08/2003 10:02:23 AM PDT by WillVoteForFood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: WillVoteForFood
"Remember it was Scott Ritter who stated he had seen proof of Hussein's abusive conduct toward children, but tried to keep it quiet as he stated he was for peace, not war. I'm sure I saw that article posted here but don't remember a title."

How could anyone see something like this and not be for freeing them? They are nearly as bad as, Saddam himself. I would have nightmares for a long time to see these children, then say I am not for the war. And Liberals are suppose to be compassionate?

93 posted on 04/08/2003 10:38:59 AM PDT by auggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: WillVoteForFood
Remember it was Scott Ritter who stated he had seen proof of Hussein's abusive conduct toward children, but tried to keep it quiet as he stated he was for peace, not war. I'm sure I saw that article posted here but don't remember a title.

Ritter was only for his personal peace and Saddam's personal war.

332 posted on 04/09/2003 12:10:57 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson