[auggy]

"Remember it was Scott Ritter who stated he had seen proof of Hussein's abusive conduct toward children, but tried to keep it quiet as he stated he was for peace, not war. I'm sure I saw that article posted here but don't remember a title."

How could anyone see something like this and not be for freeing them? They are nearly as bad as, Saddam himself. I would have nightmares for a long time to see these children, then say I am not for the war. And Liberals are suppose to be compassionate?

[Cultural Jihad]

How could anyone see something like this and not be for freeing them? They are nearly as bad as, Saddam himself. I would have nightmares for a long time to see these children, then say I am not for the war. And Liberals are suppose to be compassionate?

Their compassion is all one-sided. They have oodles of compassion for criminals but none for the victims. They have tons of compassion for gays but not for those who get AIDS from transfusions or from birth. They fawn over the thieves masquerading as homeless victims, but none for the taxpayers being forced to subsidize their laziness. They have lots of compassion for the jailers of children, but none for the toddlers in chains.

[laz17]

And Liberals are suppose to be compassionate?

Liberals are indeed compassionate. The trouble is they display compassion toward criminals and evil men, never toward the innocent and righteous. Sympathy for the devil is their fatal flaw.