To: Happy2BMe
So didn't anyone in intelligence trail them, or whoever went into that building? I don't realy need to know how the whole process works but wouldn't they want to have a way to verify their success, especially after missing him once before? Granted, I would not have wanted to be the guy standing across the street to see if anybody came out before the packages arrived but there must have been some way to keep an eye on it. Now were left to wonder whether we got him, or he got us again. The thought of him playing us on Bagdad Bob TV makes me sick. What does "very reliable intelligence" sources actually mean?
30 posted on
04/08/2003 11:03:02 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
To: showme_the_Glory
31 posted on
04/08/2003 11:09:53 AM PDT by
Happy2BMe
(HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
To: showme_the_Glory
General Brooks said at the briefing this morning that they always have at least two sources. Some of the scrolls on the TV news suggested CIA agents (SF?) were in on it.
35 posted on
04/08/2003 11:25:42 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson