The point is that in the Balkans, The US Military was used by Clinton to
Break up the Balkans to
- Expand NATO reach
- Give Nazis what they wanted in WWII
- Expand the EU that wants militarily muscle
- Divert attention from Lewinsky
- Assist Bin Laden supplied Islamists in taking over Bosnia and Kosovo.
Attack Yugoslavia that
- Had no WMD
- Didn't attack any of its' neighbors.
- Was not involved in 'genocide'
- Did not support 'terrorism'
Forced, by Clinton and NATO to participate in the Balkan 'bombing', the US Military owes it to the country to speak out against that gross misuse of power. Excuses just don't cut it.
-demonstrated the limits of U.S. technology to Chicoms and North Koreans
-gave the lesson how being an American ally does not pay in the long run. Turkey got the message and stabbed U.S. in the back
-After dragging Presidency through the mud, Clinton managed to drag U.S. Constitution through the mud as well.As Commander in Chief, he forced all those who bombed Serbia after 6oth day to spit on U.S. Constitution as well.
No liberal whitewash will mask the stain Clinton and Madeline Albright made.
You make your points and I'll make mine.
My points were in response to what NativeNewYorker said.
"This is to counter the "Bush is evil because the US is killing journalists" spin.
I'll explain so even you can understand. I hope.
If you're in a war zone you should have the commonsense to realize, you're in dangerous territory. War is hell and journalists should understand the risks involved. "If you're stupid enough to stay in a war zone, you deserve what you get". As for the attacks, the US military is simply doing its job and PresBush isn't evil.