[Reagan Man]

>>>The point is ...

You make your points and I'll make mine.

My points were in response to what NativeNewYorker said.
"This is to counter the "Bush is evil because the US is killing journalists" spin.

I'll explain so even you can understand. I hope.

If you're in a war zone you should have the commonsense to realize, you're in dangerous territory. War is hell and journalists should understand the risks involved. "If you're stupid enough to stay in a war zone, you deserve what you get". As for the attacks, the US military is simply doing its job and PresBush isn't evil.

[duckln]

How did you get so confused? The article is dated May 19, 2000, when Clinton bombed Serbia and Serbia was no war zone! People just trying to live, were bombed all over Serbia. If I were the 'military', forced by Clinton to bomb Serbia, I certainly wouldn't sport the 'ribbon', and I wouldn't admonish the dead for being stupid for being under a bomb drop.

Now it's year 2003 my friend and reporters killed in Bagdad, were mingleling with a fighting enemy and unfortunately got zapped.

The point is, that the two events cannot be linked, they were opposites, apples and oranges.