Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing's SARS Attack
Time ^ | , April 8, 2003 | SUSAN JAKES

Posted on 04/08/2003 6:52:15 AM PDT by CathyRyan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: per loin
Thanks so much for maintaining this data. I've never had confidence that even "advanced" medical establishments (like Canada) will "control" SARS. Give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that one "Typhoid Mary" carrier who causes 400 cases can still be contained. Also assume that Singapore and even Hong Kong (a real threat since it can't be isolated from world commerce) can contain SARS, for now.

The incredibly scary thought is that this epidemic is not dying out in China--that it is uncontrolled and spreading. Even if China becomes a pariah nation who's entire population is persona non grata in the civilized world, we will still not keep SARS from jumping beyond her borders again and again.

So this disease is occasionally highly communicable and kills 3% of it's victims. I have been pessimistic about it's containability since day one. We've been talking about a "new world order," asymetrical warfare, and the war on terror. If this disease hits 20% of a population and kills 3% of its victims (even more with no medical care), then we are seeing the new world order, the new terrorism, and the new asymetrical warfare being played out biologically. China cannot hope to be admitted into the community of nations--which she desperately wants--not while she practices 1960's "Soviet style" disinformation and coverup.

Her dreams of maintaining her dictatorship and lies while getting a seat with the "big players table" is impossible. This is just an early proof of her need for reform.

21 posted on 04/08/2003 11:03:07 AM PDT by DJtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: discostu
>The official word I've heard is 100 dead worldwide. We must be listening to different officials.

1) CDC and the
World Health Organization
provide up-to-date

numbers on cases
and deaths. Interestingly,
all over the globe

the death rate from SARS
hovers around 5 percent.
With the exception

of the United
States
. Here the death rate is nil.
More than a hundred

cases, and no deaths. [!]
You decide if you believe
our health officials.

2) Last week, the US
"officially" had about
70 SARS hits.

This week there are more
than 140.
Even if the death

rate is 3%,
can you calculate the deaths
after, say, six months,

with a case count that
doubles every week?* Of course,
nature is never

linear, but if
this delta doesn't change fast,
the future looks tough.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* calculate the deaths after six months with a case count that doubles every week?

x = 72

For 1 to 24
    x*2 = x
End For

Print "cases:", x
Print "deaths:", x * .03

22 posted on 04/08/2003 2:30:11 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Why'd you devide your post into a long series of haikus?

23 posted on 04/08/2003 2:32:46 PM PDT by discostu (I have not yet begun to drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson