Good and evil is what the left, in each specific case, decides what it is. There is no consistency in moral relativism. The left didn't "understand the inner child of the depraved and muderous" Slobodan Milosevic. They were unconcerned about Serbian babies and supported the destruction of Slobo's regime, no matter what the cost.
Almost 100% of the time, when the right chooses a position based on moral reasons, the left will choose the opposite position. If Clinton were president and opted to fight this battle (a long shot, to be sure), the left would be applauding his every decision.
And of course, to the modern day leftist, like Hillary Rotten Klinton, "L'etat, c'est moi." (I AM the state.)
Once again, folks:
Our military is doing a fantastic job over in Iraq we have a job to do here. Our job is to hold Leftists, liberals and so-called progressives accountable for the lies they live and the hate they spread. Our job is to get in their faces and on their cases. And since these people wont listen to reason; since they will never, ever admit that theyre wrong; since their hatred of this country and everything that it stands for can never be swayed the only options left for us are to either shun them or go nuclear on them.
We can shun them by refusing to speak to them. We can shun them by refusing to do business with them, no matter what the personal cost. We can shun them by turning our backs on them when they speak. We can shun them by standing up and leaving the room when they open their mouths with their lies and hate. We can shun them by refusing to obey their commands or give in to their demands.
We can go nuclear on them by getting right in their faces with righteous anger - and tell them exactly who and what they are. We can go nuclear on them by encouraging others to stand up to them with the same righteous anger.
We can take back the language theyve hijacked in the service of their sick ideas and their hatred of our values. For example, most leftists and socialists will never, ever admit that they are leftists or socialists. Instead, they like to use inoffensive terms like progressive, thinking that we wont notice the switch in this verbal shell game. Its a sidestep that you cannot allow them to make. Halt the conversation and ask, OK you say that youre a progressive. Towards what are you progressing? If they say something like peace and justice, ask them what they mean by that. Peace and justice for whom? And at whose expense? Make them define their terms. Press them hard enough with questions like this make them account for their ideas and their consequences - and pretty soon, all youll get from them is name calling and hate. And thats exactly what you want to expose - the fact that theres really nothing of substance behind their fantasies but envy, hate and contempt for people of faith and goodwill. Were in their way, you see.
And if they offer violence as a response, then we can and should use overwhelming force to defeat them.
As the Bradley Fighting Vehicle commander said as he was on the road to Baghdad God and country baby! Were coming in! Thats why were doing this and we are going to WIN!