Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Tuesday, April 8, 2003

Quote of the Day by rageaholic

1 posted on 04/08/2003 4:54:22 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
You are to understand that there is no good and no evil. Where the inner child of the depraved and murderous, like Saddam Hussein, is to be "understood" and negotiated with.

Good and evil is what the left, in each specific case, decides what it is. There is no consistency in moral relativism. The left didn't "understand the inner child of the depraved and muderous" Slobodan Milosevic. They were unconcerned about Serbian babies and supported the destruction of Slobo's regime, no matter what the cost.

Almost 100% of the time, when the right chooses a position based on moral reasons, the left will choose the opposite position. If Clinton were president and opted to fight this battle (a long shot, to be sure), the left would be applauding his every decision.

2 posted on 04/08/2003 5:13:45 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
I don't think it's an issue of the Left believing there is no right or wrong. They most definitely do believe in the concepts of right and wrong. Their problem is they have the concepts reversed. If they truly didn't believe there's a difference between right and wrong, they wouldn't be condemning Bush. They would be nonjudgmental toward him. But on the contrary, they are VERY judgmental toward him. So they most definitely believe in right and wrong, in good and evil. It's just that their moral compasses are upside down. And that's why they see Bush as the villain and Saddam as the victim, because they call evil good and good evil.
3 posted on 04/08/2003 5:23:28 AM PDT by laz17 (Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
BUMP
5 posted on 04/08/2003 5:47:05 AM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
BUMP
7 posted on 04/08/2003 7:48:29 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Anyone who knows anything about the left should not be surprised by this article. As Lenin wrote extensively about it in the 1920's this is truely "old news". When asked what was communist morality, Lenin basically said "anything that serves the State".

And of course, to the modern day leftist, like Hillary Rotten Klinton, "L'etat, c'est moi." (I AM the state.)

8 posted on 04/08/2003 8:28:44 AM PDT by jimt (Support our troops !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
bump
9 posted on 04/08/2003 8:35:09 AM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Copied and sent to the rest of the family with this commentary:

Once again, folks:

 

Our military is doing a fantastic job over in Iraq – we have a job to do here. Our job is to hold Leftists, liberals and so-called ‘progressives’ accountable for the lies they live and the hate they spread. Our job is to get in their faces and on their cases. And since these people won’t listen to reason; since they will never, ever admit that they’re wrong; since their hatred of this country and everything that it stands for can never be swayed – the only options left for us are to either shun them or go nuclear on them.

 

We can shun them by refusing to speak to them. We can shun them by refusing to do business with them, no matter what the personal cost. We can shun them by turning our backs on them when they speak. We can shun them by standing up and leaving the room when they open their mouths with their lies and hate. We can shun them by refusing to obey their commands or give in to their demands.

 

We can go nuclear on them by getting right in their faces with righteous anger - and tell them exactly who and what they are.  We can go nuclear on them by encouraging others to stand up to them with the same righteous anger.

 

We can take back the language they’ve hijacked in the service of their sick ideas and their hatred of our values. For example, most leftists and socialists will never, ever admit that they are leftists or socialists. Instead, they like to use inoffensive terms like ‘progressive,’ thinking that we won’t notice the switch in this verbal shell game.  It’s a sidestep that you cannot allow them to make. Halt the conversation and ask, “OK – you say that you’re a ‘progressive.’ Towards what are you ‘progressing?’ If they say something like ‘peace and justice,’ ask them what they mean by that. ‘Peace and justice’ for whom? And at whose expense? Make them define their terms. Press them hard enough with questions like this – make them account for their ideas and their consequences - and pretty soon, all you’ll get from them is name calling and hate. And that’s exactly what you want to expose - the fact that there’s really nothing of substance behind their fantasies but envy, hate and contempt for people of faith and goodwill. We’re in their way, you see.

 

And if they offer violence as a response, then we can and should use overwhelming force to defeat them.

 

As the Bradley Fighting Vehicle commander said as he was on the road to Baghdad – “God and country baby! We’re coming in! That’s why we’re doing this and we are going to WIN!”

13 posted on 04/08/2003 9:46:41 AM PDT by Noumenon (You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
.....bump.....
16 posted on 04/08/2003 5:39:58 PM PDT by houstonian (The Liberal and his conceit--a vicious cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson