Skip to comments.
Protesters stop Australian warship leaving for Iraq
Reuters
| 4/07/03
Posted on 04/07/2003 7:16:10 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
04/07/2003 7:16:10 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Set sail anyway. Fewer morons in the gene pool.
2
posted on
04/07/2003 7:18:42 PM PDT
by
hobblemaster
(Hey Demorats, stop whinning, BUSH WON!!!!)
To: kattracks
Nothing a few stitches across the bow wouldn't solve.
3
posted on
04/07/2003 7:18:47 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
(Tagline maintenance in progress......)
To: kattracks
..."Anti-war protesters stopped an Australian warship on Tuesday leaving Sydney Harbour for Iraq by attaching themselves to the ship with mountain climbing gear and laying an underwater object in front of the vessel."...
Geez. Maybe the anti-war protesters would like a ride to the front lines?...
To: harpseal; Squantos; wardaddy; river rat; Poohbah; SLB
All ahead flank. Chop them to chum. Let the hangers hang on all the way out into the ocean and drop off or starve.
5
posted on
04/07/2003 7:21:35 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(***PACIFISTS ARE THE PARASITES OF FREEDOM***)
To: kattracks
The aussie special ops guys are terrific, but I think their harbor police need a little work. Why not steam ahead...see how long the guy on the stern wants to protest?!
To: kattracks
Look!
I think it's time for all freedom loving countries to stop using the freedom cliche
(we fight wars for you to have the right to do what you do) These dirt bags are no better than the enemy we are fighting. Leaving them to continue disrupting a political process and decision to defend the innocent of Iraq or any other country living under fear of terrorism has to stop.
Wake up America
7
posted on
04/07/2003 7:25:16 PM PDT
by
chachacha
To: kattracks
Isn't this why warships have guns? So they can shoot enemy combatants who get in their way?
8
posted on
04/07/2003 7:27:41 PM PDT
by
HHFi
To: kattracks
In this post 9-11 world, I cannot believe the Aussie military would allow a breach of security such as this. Incredible. Heads need to roll for this.
To: kattracks
Keelhaul the B*******
To: kattracks
Actually, this is a good thing. The democrats are associated with these radical ideas. The more that these stupid things happen, the better for us. It strengthens the rationality of our party. People may not be republicans, but they don't necessarily want to be associated with that type of behavior either. The middle of the roaders will probably feel better voting republican, than democratic. Hopefully, I'm not being too optimistic....
11
posted on
04/07/2003 7:29:14 PM PDT
by
Violette
To: kattracks
Nothing like a little target practice before yo get to Iraq. We wouldn't want the Ausies to get to Iraq without proper training. Besides what is one or two less Greennies?
12
posted on
04/07/2003 7:32:42 PM PDT
by
OneVike
To: You Dirty Rats
cat-o-nine tails =8^>
13
posted on
04/07/2003 7:33:12 PM PDT
by
Nebr FAL owner
(.308 "reach out and thump someone " & .50 cal Browning "reach out & CRUSH someone")
To: chachacha
Maybe Oregon has the right idea to declear protesters interfering with law terrorists. They are no better.
They may have the right to their disgusting opinions, but they don't have the right to interfere with the business of the country, or the society.
To: kattracks
"Greenpeace said in a statement it had stopped HMAS Sydney leaving by using a flotilla of yachts, small craft, swimmers and divers. "
---
The Harbor police should have started to sink the yachts, then see how many of them want to hang around. There is no other way of dealing with them, since they disregard the law.
To: kattracks
The Ship's Captain should have ordered a depth charge set on shallow and fired it. Thae would have solved the problem.
16
posted on
04/07/2003 7:39:17 PM PDT
by
sport
To: kattracks
If the ship can't crash through, send divers to cut the cable and THEN crash through. Cut the grappling hooks and drop the hangers on into the water. What is wrong with the Australian government?
17
posted on
04/07/2003 7:50:30 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions= Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: kattracks
"Australia has sent 2,000 military personnel, two warships, attack aircraft and special forces troops to the Gulf to join larger contingents from the United States and Britain."What if by stopping that ship, these cute little protestors which the authorities were scared to capture have condemned 2000 Aussie troops to death?
18
posted on
04/07/2003 7:57:02 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions= Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Travis McGee
Pink frothy foam wake BTTT
19
posted on
04/07/2003 7:59:12 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(G-d speed our fighters!)
To: American Blood
There's another idea for al-Qaeda...
20
posted on
04/07/2003 8:04:40 PM PDT
by
Publicus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson