Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defeats dismay Arab media
The Daily Telegraph ^ | April 7, 2003 | Gerald Butt

Posted on 04/06/2003 4:28:48 PM PDT by MadIvan

Arab satellite news channels, broadcasting footage of advances by coalition forces on Baghdad, are beginning to question whether Saddam Hussein has put up a proper fight against the allied advances.

Throughout the Arab world there is a mood of disappointment. The initial resistance by Saddam's forces raised expectations that he would put up a tougher fight around the capital.

"Why is he letting the Arabs down now," a Lebanese caller asked a phone-in programme, "when his forces fought so bravely in the south of the country?"

A presenter on the Dubai-based al-Arabiya television network said the Iraqi leader had promised "surprises" that would inflict huge losses. "Why have we not seen the surprises?"

A military expert later wondered why the Iraqi army had not concentrated on attacking the allies' supply lines, rather than moving forces back to try to defend Baghdad. "Saddam's fedayeen should be attacking the trucks carrying food, water and fuel," he added.

"Why didn't Saddam order all the bridges to be blown up along the route to the capital?" another studio guest wondered.

Several Arab newspapers highlight the discrepancy between Iraq's assessment of the war and that of the coalition forces. "The information war is intensifying," said al-Sharq in Qatar. In Jordan, al-Rai asked "where the real truth lies amid the confusion and contradiction of the news reports?" Nevertheless, on its front page the paper's main headline read: "Iraq retakes Saddam airport."

The Lebanese daily al-Nahar went one better, saying that "Saddam led the attack to retake the airport", while Akhbar al-Khaleej in Bahrain said: "We have wiped out the invading forces at the airport."

But other Arab papers adopt a more realistic line, with al-Watan in Saudi Arabia declaring that "the Americans have taken the airport and the Iraqis have retreated into Baghdad".

Kuwait's Rai al-Am assessed the situation in three words: "Baghdad's last stand."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdaddefense; blair; bush; iraq; iraqifreedom; saddam; uk; us; viceisclosing; war; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: Dog Gone
"Saddam led the attack to retake the airport"

Saddam and What Army?

61 posted on 04/06/2003 4:59:15 PM PDT by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
"So many losers, so much ammo..."

Didn't I reads they have now captured over 120 ammo bunkers filled to the rafters? Some military guy said something like they have already found more ordnance than they have stored at Camp Lejune. Another said something like they've found more ordnance than our combined forces brought with them into Kuwait...

So, you're right. We don't even have to re-supply from the States...just used their own stuff against them.

62 posted on 04/06/2003 5:00:05 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Throughout the Arab world there is a mood of disappointment. The initial resistance by Saddam's forces raised expectations that he would put up a tougher fight around the capital.

Bwa-hahahahahahahhahhah. Those suckers bought that banquet of BS hook line and sinker, and now reality is crashing down like a sledgehammer against their testicles. Ha ha heh...

63 posted on 04/06/2003 5:00:24 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Arabs like lies, have you not noticed? They prefer a lie over the truth. "Believe a lie and be damned". They need to change their way of thinking.
64 posted on 04/06/2003 5:00:25 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
No they just have an "official rag" that can't tell a lie.

Think, if you only heard crap from Jennings/arnett..

only read from the NYtimes editor column what would you
think? marxist/dictator regimes first order of battle
control the press and the schools--indoctrinate,indoctrinate

INDOCTRINATE! this is Orwell's 1984
65 posted on 04/06/2003 5:02:39 PM PDT by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
At least some are seeing what is actually happening rather than believing the Iraqi spin zone master, Bagdad Bob.
66 posted on 04/06/2003 5:04:49 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
They do this every time something happens. Their press misleads them to the heights of ecstasy and then reality falls on them. Yet they keep on believing their fake press over and over again.



It reminds me of battered women going back to their abusive husbands.

"Maybe next time they will tell me the truth."

67 posted on 04/06/2003 5:04:52 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
may I borrow that? I can use it when I have to argue with Lefties who support Hussein, instead of USA.
68 posted on 04/06/2003 5:06:02 PM PDT by buffyt (Can you say President Hillary, Mistress of Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I have always felt that in some weird way, the Arab Media, the US liberal media, and the anti-war crowd may have given Saddam a false sense of hope....that he could win beleiveing the US forces were like the liberals and their media supporters

He learned otherwise real quickly. His Republican Guard fought like a male San Francisco Democrat...his Feyadeen eventually got rounded up (most are now dead from UK forces).....and his weapons have been rendered mostly useless by the Coalition

I think, in an eerie way, the left may have helped topple Saddam
69 posted on 04/06/2003 5:07:50 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (Terrorists Disappointed: Madonna Not Really "Like A Virgin")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Message for the rest of the "Peace Loving" Arab world:

Don't mess with us!
70 posted on 04/06/2003 5:08:42 PM PDT by The South Texan (The TV Media (save FOX News,) is our worst Enemy!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Classic.

Even the laundry heads have arm-chair quarterbacks.

Thanks for this one.
71 posted on 04/06/2003 5:10:30 PM PDT by lodwick (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
From Saddam to Dam Sad
72 posted on 04/06/2003 5:11:08 PM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
If I'm hearing correctly, based on what I'm being told about the different strains of Muslims, Ayotollah Khomeini was one of the nice ones.
73 posted on 04/06/2003 5:12:01 PM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Time and again we've seen that Arabs and Democrats are pretty much the same: powerdrunk, cowardly, and delusional. No wonder all the Democrats are rooting for the Arabs.
74 posted on 04/06/2003 5:14:28 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Their payment for believing a word the 'Arab press' says.

Look at the bright side.
The Muslim press has been so monumentally clumsy, inept and incompetent, the odds are that any arab with half a brain in his head will question everything that the muslim media says in the future.

Reality is a b**ch.

75 posted on 04/06/2003 5:14:30 PM PDT by Publius6961 (p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Many elements of the Western media also.
76 posted on 04/06/2003 5:15:17 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"Why is he letting the Arabs down now," a Lebanese caller asked a phone-in programme, "when his forces fought so bravely in the south of the country?"

Bravely? Ambushing a few of our troops after pretending to surrender is brave? ...LOL!

77 posted on 04/06/2003 5:15:58 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Indeed. The same could be said for the leftwing press in America and Europe, of course.

Hopefully many have seen the truth.
78 posted on 04/06/2003 5:16:38 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
A presenter on the Dubai-based al-Arabiya television network said the Iraqi leader had promised "surprises" that would inflict huge losses. "Why have we not seen the surprises?"

It sounds like many of these jokers wanted Saddam to use bio/chem weapons.

79 posted on 04/06/2003 5:17:10 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ima Lurker
hehehe.... especially The New York Times no doubt put off by Brit Hume's joke at their expense!
80 posted on 04/06/2003 5:17:22 PM PDT by goldstategop (Lara Logan Doesn't Hold A Candle Next To BellyGirl :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson