Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is This Really an All-Volunteer Army?
NY Times (Week in Review) ^ | April 6, 2003 | STEVEN A. HOLMES

Posted on 04/06/2003 7:19:11 AM PDT by Pharmboy


Associated Press
The 4th Infantry Division, shipping out from Texas.

WASHINGTON — Does the United States military have to be representative of American society? The question has hung heavy since war with Iraq first seemed inevitable, and with it the possibility of heavy casualties. Now, with that war at a climax, a small band of critics continues to maintain that the all-volunteer force — which is 30 years old this year — is all-volunteer in name only.

They argue that relative economic disadvantage has replaced local draft boards in determining who enters the military, especially the enlisted ranks, and that it is un-American to have an affluent nation being defended by working-class young people, heavily layered with minorities.

"It's not fair that the people that we ask to fight the war are people who join the military because of economic conditions," says Representative Charles B. Rangel, the New York Democrat, who advocates a new draft.

When compared with other groups of the same age, the American military, particularly in its enlisted ranks, in fact has fewer rich people. But it also has fewer poor ones. It has more Southerners and fewer Northeasterners. It has a higher percentage of black people, especially black women, compared with the larger population, but a smaller proportion of Hispanics.

Defenders of the all-volunteer force, particularly in the Pentagon, quickly rebutted Mr. Rangel's arguments. They asserted that the military does reflect the country's population, especially when the number of officers — about one-seventh of the military, virtually all of them college graduates — is considered. They also note that while the median income for households that produce white recruits is lower than for other white homes, the median income of the families of black recruits is actually higher than it is for blacks as a whole.

Moreover, supporters of the volunteer force say, the military is, they say, more professional, better motivated and more stable when soldiers, sailors, pilots and others stay in for longer stints. They point to its performance in the Persian Gulf war, the Afghanistan campaign and now Iraq. And they shudder at returning to the often-troubled conscripted military of the Vietnam era, just to make a point about equity that not everyone feels could even be remedied.

"I served in a draft force," a senior Defense Department official said earlier this year. "I remember when enlisted folks fragged — as we liked to say — threw grenades into the officers' quarters in Vietnam. Not a pretty picture."

Comparisons with Vietnam gloss over the experience of World War II, when an American military force, heavy with conscripts, defeated the German military machine, considered at the time the world's best. Put side by side, the comparisons suggest that when it comes to efficiency and motivation, the issue may not be volunteers versus draftees, but a popular war verses an unpopular one.

But the central question about the volunteer force remains Mr. Rangel's: How much choice is there? In some sense the fact that blacks, especially black women, not only enlist, but re-enlist in a higher proportion than whites is seen as an example of the equal opportunity the armed services provide. But it could also be viewed as indicating the lack of opportunity — real or perceived — for African-Americans in civilian society.

Demographic trends don't promise to make the choices easier. With incomes having stagnated except for those people with college degrees, the percentage of youths choosing to continue their education after high school has exploded. In 1970, about 55 percent of men and about 48 percent of women enrolled in college right out of high school. By 1999, 63 percent of men and 64 percent of women were doing so. The sharp increases, which show no sign of leveling off, have put enormous pressure on military recruiters to fill their quotas.

The Defense Department has responded by trying to reduce the need to make a choice between military service and a college education. In recent years it has expanded programs to help members of the military pay for college after active duty. It has permitted more of them to attend college while in the service. So the issue of who serves and who doesn't becomes more and more a matter of who can afford college without help.

Recruiters' task is further complicated by some more specific educational trends as well. Studies have shown that one of the biggest influences on teenagers' career decisions is the educational attainment of their mothers — more so than of their fathers.

With the spectacular growth in the number of women going to college (they now outnumber men), the Pentagon faces a daunting prospect: some day, those legions of educated mothers will, at the same time, be setting a standard at home that will steer their children more surely toward college, even as their added income will help insure that the family has the money to pay for college without turning to military service.

"Parents are certainly major influences, mothers in particular," said Paul R. Sackett, a professor of psychology at the University of Minnesota who studied the challenges that face military recruiters.

Among one group, Hispanics, increases in college attendance have not kept pace with those among blacks and non-Hispanic whites. This could mean that the percentage of the military made up of Hispanics will grow, and the chances that will happen received a boost from President Bush last July, when he signed an executive order providing that any legal immigrant who has been on active duty since Sept. 11, 2001, may immediately apply for citizenship, bypassing the normal three-year waiting period for military personnel and the five-year period for civilians.

But do all of these changes guarantee that the military will become any more or less reflective of American society? Consider this: Even though a shrinking proportion of teenagers has been seeking to enlist, the number of American teenagers is expected to grow in the coming decade, giving recruiters a bigger pool to appeal to. And even if the armed services sign up more Hispanics, demographers say the percentage of the population that is Hispanic is likely to rise relatively quickly too. So the military may wind up merely reflecting the country's demographic change.

Such calculations — and debates about whether the burden of military service will be fairly distributed — are the price of trying to keep an all-volunteer force in balance with a population that is, itself, constantly changing.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hyphenatedamericans; quotas; socialclass; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: tcostell
Great story.
61 posted on 04/06/2003 9:07:15 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Brnet Bozell's excellent organization Media Research Center link to their site actually did research on journalists in their book And That's the Way it Isn't, and discovered some fascinating stats:

- 64% of journalists came from only 3 states (NY, NJ, Penn)

- 2/3 of journalists came from families that were in the top 10% of the financial bracket (translation: rich kids)

- over 84% of journalists admitted to seldom or never attending church

62 posted on 04/06/2003 9:13:50 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I'd like him to publish any research he's done on the thousands of other occupations.

Oh, he hasn't?
63 posted on 04/06/2003 9:18:57 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Without the draft, it's hard to organize antiwar protests. They want to restore the draft so they can protest against it.
64 posted on 04/06/2003 9:45:25 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Restart the draft so that some of the volunteer positions are taken by draftees? What a great idea. Some people who don't want to be in the military will be forced to serve and some people who want to serve can't do so because draftees are filling the billets they wanted to volunteer for.
Rangle and the N.Y. Times, simply an extremist love fest.
65 posted on 04/06/2003 9:45:43 AM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"It's not fair that the people that we ask to fight the war are people who join the military because of economic conditions," says Representative Charles B. Rangel, the New York Democrat, who advocates a new draft.

Yeah, black volunteers might get conservative as the gain rank and move into the middle class.

The might even, Gasp start voting Republican.

SO9

66 posted on 04/06/2003 10:33:58 AM PDT by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Over heard at the New York Crimes editorial office " Okay we tried saying that the war was for oil - that didn't work. We said it was a Viet Nam quagmire - even we knew that was bogus. We said the "unnamed Republicans had problems with the conduct of the war but; that didn't stick. Anybody got any other ideas about what we can say? Yeah Ivan, what do you have? Say the military isn't really a volunteer operation since the imperialists have made it impossible for minorities to do anything else. Sounds like a bunch of crap but hey we're out of attacks right now let's go with it."
67 posted on 04/06/2003 10:55:12 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I wholeheartedly agree with you. Last Sunday there was an editorial in our local paper about how recruiters use deceitful tactics to prey on the poor working class kids. The editorial also whined about the fact that there was no draft and he "dreamed" that there was a draft as to create outrage among the elites about war. I had to respond because, number 1 my husband is unfortunately on recruiting duty and number 2, the editorial was absolutely ridiculous...he kept talking about "dreaming". That's a liberal for ya though, they don't seem to deal in reality! LOL!

My response got published and hubby said he loved the one question I had for that guy...would he and followers of his political ilk rather see some poor kid join the military and at least have a shot at something better or continue to live in a drug and gang infested neighborhood and/or in poverty?? Also, this is just my observation, but not all of hubby's recruits are from poor families. He's recruited college grads, a kid whose parents are both doctors, kids from middle class families in addition to kids from working class families. Heck, my husband was from a well to do family ( his father was a retired full colonel to boot) and he enlisted. What I'm trying to say is that the military is made up of people from all walks of life and I'm so sick of articles like this simply trying to race bait and wage class warfare. I'm thoroughly convinced that the political left does not want people to be better off...they want to keep poor/working class down so they can have a voting bloc. They're all about appearances, apppearing like they want to help those in need, but never do a dang thing about it!
68 posted on 04/06/2003 11:16:23 AM PDT by rangerwife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy


69 posted on 04/06/2003 11:36:23 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK ("He is a moss-gatherer, and I have been a stone doomed to rolling." Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
This is one more way the left gets airtime. Inequality and such.

This war in Iraq proves a volunteer army is more efficient, professional and trustworthy than a conscripted one.
70 posted on 04/06/2003 12:17:30 PM PDT by tillacum (YooooooHooooooooo Saydam, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Great post, AP. Where's it from?

I tell my kids that when anyone asks them their ethnic background to answer "American!"

71 posted on 04/06/2003 12:21:44 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Remember when Folley, the fellow who took stuff (I think food and silverware from first class flights) off airplanes, said,"there may be no proof here, but we have to investigate it anyway"? Only democrat can see nothing seriously wrong, but spend big bucks, get lots of air time by investigating it.
72 posted on 04/06/2003 12:25:08 PM PDT by tillacum (YooooooHooooooooo Saydam, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Drive, motivation, not wanting to work 9 to 5 in an office. A childhood friend went to college, then joined the navy (now retired, he earned the trident.)

As for demographic averages, the average human in the US has 1 breast capable of lactation, 1 testicle, 1 ovary,.....and maybe half a spine.

73 posted on 04/06/2003 12:26:43 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Yep, and the Times ran essentially this same article last week, complaining that the military was too southern and too conservative.
74 posted on 04/06/2003 1:01:58 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Here ya go

One place of many in a google search .

75 posted on 04/06/2003 1:07:36 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK ("He is a moss-gatherer, and I have been a stone doomed to rolling." Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"It's not fair that the people that we ask to fight the war are people who join the military because of economic conditions,"...

The same could be said for youngsters working in fast food restaurants.

76 posted on 04/06/2003 1:36:01 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Soddom has left the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I know that Rangell served with distinction and I thank him for his service.

That said he is demeaning all soldiers that are making that same contribution. He is trying to turn African-American deaths into George Bush lynchings.

77 posted on 04/06/2003 2:00:10 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Soddom has left the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Does the United States military have to be representative of American society?

YES! They DO! They're ALL AMERICAN'S, YOU STUPID PEOPLE!

78 posted on 04/06/2003 2:01:43 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
There really sad thing is that journalists are not representative of American Society.

"They seem to more represent Russian society."

More particularly, mainstream journalists seem representative of Soviet cadres.

79 posted on 04/06/2003 2:07:55 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Amazing that, in a thousand word article, the Times can advance an assertion -- that the military is disproportionately composed of minorities and lower class young people -- and not produce a single, solitary fact in support of their assertion!

Could it be they don't have any...???

80 posted on 04/06/2003 2:14:38 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson