Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KERRY ALERT: Americans tell Kerry where to put his "regime change"
NY POST ^ | April 6, 2003 | letters column

Posted on 04/06/2003 3:14:12 AM PDT by Liz

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:13:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In its effort to disarm a genuine madman, the U.S. military has gone further, saved more Iraqi civilians and taken fewer casualties then any one dared to dream possible. In spite of this - or perhaps because of our success - presidential hopeful Sen. John Kerry sees fit to call for a regime change in America ("John Kerry's Calumny," Editorial, April 4). By uttering these contemptible words while our brave men and women are in combat, Kerry proves himself to be shameless, despicable and completely unfit for any type of political office in this nation. Democrats should speak out against him, or they will soon be battling the Green Party for political relevancy.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; kerry; lte; regimechange
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: F16Fighter
Yeah, but from the looks of things, Herman's neck bolts got transplanted into Kerry's brain. LOL.
21 posted on 04/06/2003 4:37:25 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Apparently this is on the Rat talking points list

Couldn't be better! If all the DemonRats start spouting the same awful bile, the lot of them will disgust at least two-thirds of the country, assuring re-election. Keep it up, boys!

22 posted on 04/06/2003 4:42:48 AM PDT by Nevermore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz
STOLEN VALOR
How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of its Heroes and its History

by B.G. Burkett/Glenna Whitley

In April 1971, the VVAW staged a demonstration it called Dewey Canyon III , a "limited incursion into the country of Congress." ....


page 135

After a man who said his son died in Vietnam blew taps, the soldiers began flinging their war medals over a high wire fence in front of the Capitol: Purple Hearts, Bronze Star Medals, Silver Stars - bits of ribbon and metal hurled in the face of the government that had so betrayed them. Some, after throwing away what had cost them so dearly, broke down and cried.

One of those was John Kerry , Vietnam Navy veteran and aspiring politician who had been among those who organized the protest. Kerry flung a handful of medals - he had received the Silver Star, a Bronze Star Medal, and three Purple Hearts - over the fence. Kerry spoke later that week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, putting a face on the antiwar movement far different from the one seen before - the scruffy hippie or wild-eyed activist .Kerry represented the All-American boy, mentally twisted by being asked to do terrible things, then abandoned by his government .

From start to finish, the public took Dewey Canyon III at face value, not understanding that they were watching brilliant political theater. Kerry , a Kennedy protege with white-hot political aspirations , ascended center stage as both a war hero and as an antiwar hero throwing away his combat decorations. His speech, apparently off the cuff, was eloquent, impassioned.


But years later, after his election to the Senate ,Kerry's medals turned up on the wall of his Capitol Hill office. When a reporter noticed them, Kerry admitted that the medals he had thrown that day were not his .[see footnote #209] And Kerry's emotional, from-the-heart speech had been carefully crafted by a speechwriter for Robert Kennedy named Adam Walinsky, who also tutored him on how to present it. TV reporters totally ignored another Vietnam veteran , Melville L. Stephens, a former aide to Adm. Elmo Zumwalt, chief of Naval Operations, who that same day urged the Senate not to abandon America's allies in South Vietnam.

"Peace for us must not come at the cost of their lives,"

Stephens said in a speech he wrote himself. ...


page 136

How many of the other participants in Dewey Canyon threw away "props" ? How many were really Vietnam veterans ?
23 posted on 04/06/2003 4:54:48 AM PDT by chellis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chellis
A Washington Times column from 1/5/03 is repeated here: The Crucifixtion of Vietnam's Montagnards: Christmas 2002 (copy-protected). At the bottom it explains that John Kerry blocked passage of the Vietnam Human Rights Act in the Senate. This bill passed the House 410-1.
24 posted on 04/06/2003 5:16:04 AM PDT by pave palestine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"Kerry proves himself to be shameless, despicable and completely unfit for any type of political office in this nation."

Well, I guess the search for Clinton's replacement is over.

25 posted on 04/06/2003 5:23:07 AM PDT by Feckless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pave palestine
Full Text:

Just before Christmas, five members of Vietnam’s security forces entered the hill tribe village of Plei JoNing in the central highlands – searching for Christians. They arrested three Montagnards - Siu Seo, Siu Ai and Nay Glel and took them to their office in Phu Thien town. “We will see if your god can help you now”, they told the prisoners as they crucified them to flagpoles in the figure of the cross.

The “centurions” however, did not spear the Christian Montagnards. Instead they tortured them with an electric cattle prod. The Vietnamese police taunted the victims hanging there - “Where is your Jesus now?” The Montagnard Christians however, refused to renounce their belief in God and hung there for one day and a night.

This event actually occurred in the year 2000 on December 2nd. It was an event that would escalate into a new phase of persecution in 2002 confronting the indigenous Montagnards. Today in the central highlands of Vietnam brutal martial law is being enforced by the Vietnamese government - while the world remains largely silent - while Western governments (and Japan) grant billions of dollars of aid to Vietnam and discuss trade deals.

Today in Vietnam thousands of soldiers repress Christianity to a degree that prompted several Ministers from the European Parliament and members of the Transnational Radical Party to write to Kok Ksor, President of the Montagnard Foundation in the United States. They urged him to have his people inside Vietnam cancel Christmas celebrations in order to prevent further retaliations by the Vietnamese government.

Why however, does Vietnam continue to persecute the Montagnards - one of the oldest races of indigenous people in Asia?

The answer lies partially in “revenge” as over 40,000 Montagnards had served as “loyal Allies” to the US military during the Vietnam War. After taking over South Vietnam in 1975 the victorious communists would have the Montagnard leaders executed for supporting the United States.

The Hanoi government also started a long-term plan to exploit the natural resources of the Montagnards. It was a plan however, that could not take place with the Montagnard people remaining on their ancestral lands. Officially this policy today is called “Fixed/Field - Fixed/Residence”. It forcibly relocates the Montagnards to small plots of infertile land where they starve and suffer malnutrition while their homelands are carved up by the government to make way for coffee plantations and logging operations.

Once the Montagnards are driven from their lands, the authorities relocate migrants from other parts of Vietnam to the region. It is a process of colonization where the Montagnards become an exploited minority. UNICEF would report in 2001 that Montagnard children are destined to suffer extreme poverty and malnutrition. “But the reason you Montagnards are poor is because you have too many children” the Vietnamese government then declares. And so Hanoi enforces mandatory family planning sessions and coercive sterilization on the Montagnards to “reduce their poverty”.

The Vietnamese government offers cash incentives to the poor Montagnards to get surgically sterilized. To enforce these policies Hanoi uses funding from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the World Bank and Asian Development Bank. Last year the government officially announced zero growth targets for the Montagnards. However, does the world realize there are 80 million ethnic Vietnamese in Vietnam and that the Montagnard’s entire population today numbers less than one million? Given that Human Rights Watch stated in 2002 - “The Montagnards have been repressed for decades”, should we support the Vietnamese regime with such aid, when it has a horrendous record of violating human rights?

I met a Montagnard woman whose sister had agreed to become surgically sterilized after authorities promised her husband a job in the police force. Because they were poor, her sister agreed, but she died whilst undergoing the operation. That was in 1997 and after her death the authorities then fired the husband from the 'promised job' in the police.

In April 2000 I went to the office of the UNFPA in Geneva. The chief external relations officer, ‘Eric Palstra’ could not explain the allegations of sterilizations but stated “correct implementation of family planning programs does not always trickle down to local authorities in Vietnam.”

Earlier this year in 2002 villages such as Buon Tri, Dak Lac province were surrounded by Vietnamese soldiers. Montagnard girls were forced at gunpoint to succumb to injections operated by mobile medical teams and were told the injections prevent them from giving birth.

If journalists and human rights monitors were not banned from the region - perhaps someone could assist this village…but of course that is Hanoi’s plan - to keep their deadly secrets hidden.

Other horrors are documented by the US State Department, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International where Montagnards were forced to renounce Christianity while drinking animal’s blood. Freedom House would expose “Plan 184” a centrally directed campaign to "target and suppress Christians in ethnic minority areas”.

But why is Vietnam so afraid of Christianity?

The communist party today is standing at a crossroads - facing a new road leading to the wealth of capitalism. The other road however, is the worn path of outdated communist ideology where the prospect of losing power to “religious influence” is too great a risk for the communist elite.

The greatest fear of Vietnam’s dictatorial regime is that their monopoly of power will collapse like the Soviet Union. Hanoi calls this great fear “peaceful evolution”. It is a word that emerged in Hanoi’s vocabulary when the Berlin Wall fell - and it rippled like a serpent across the ocean. It is why today “Hanoi’s bamboo wall of repression" remains.

This past Christmas in 2002 soldiers blared threats to Montagnard Christians using megaphones - “If you celebrate Christmas we will arrest you.” Soldiers even threatened to shoot them on the spot.

What is even more sinister however, is that Western governments and Japan continue to support Vietnam through financial aid and trade agreements. The European Union recently granted millions of dollars of aid to Vietnam - with no strings attached. Last year In the United States, Senator John Kerry brought a terrible shame on America's Congress as he prevented the Vietnam Human Rights Act from being voted on in the Senate. (The House of Representatives voted 410-1 in its favor).

On October 29,2002 three Christian Montagnards were given lethal injections in their prison cells. They died in convulsing spasms. One was a Christian preacher named Y-Het Nie Kdam. The other two are Y-Suon Mlo and Y- Wan Ayun.

Today however, it is the entire Montagnard race that is hanging on the cross facing execution. And Vietnam is not alone in this tyranny but Western governments and Japan who collude with Hanoi’s butchers are also shamefully guilty. We shall soon see if these governments and people like Senator John Kerry will – like Pontius Pilate - try to wash their hands of this genocidal crime against the Montagnards.

26 posted on 04/06/2003 5:30:07 AM PDT by pave palestine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pave palestine

27 posted on 04/06/2003 5:31:38 AM PDT by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

28 posted on 04/06/2003 5:32:40 AM PDT by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pave palestine
Interesting post. I had not seen this article, but then why should that surpirse me. The press doesn't like reporting this type of story. But I give the Washington Times great credit for shining light on the horrible mistreatment of Christians at the hands of Vietnam's government. Too bad it goes unnoticed by most.
29 posted on 04/06/2003 5:43:32 AM PDT by chellis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: chellis
But I give the Washington Times great credit for shining light on the horrible mistreatment of Christians at the hands of Vietnam's government. Too bad it goes unnoticed by most.

It goes unnoticed by the Democratic media because they *support* the mistreatment of Christians by anyone, foreign or domestic. The only religion they support is Islam because so many Islamists hate America.

30 posted on 04/06/2003 7:38:06 AM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Geraldo was only a jerk, not a traitor
31 posted on 04/06/2003 7:41:27 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of Ameri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
There was a story about former Senator Bob Kerrey leading a seven-member team of Navy Seals into Thanh Phong village in February 1969, that murdered more than a dozen women and children which was supposedly part of a CIA mission to commit war crimes.

How Clintonesque...

32 posted on 04/06/2003 7:50:30 AM PDT by meyer (how do I turn this thing off?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Feckless
(Kerry's like Clinton) ....shameless, despicable and completely unfit for any type of political office.......

Just the type of candidate Dumbocrat dupes slaver over and throw money at.

33 posted on 04/06/2003 8:56:20 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard; kitkat
Geraldo was only a jerk, not a traitor

Geraldo's qualifications are well-stated..........takes a jerk to be a traitor.

34 posted on 04/06/2003 9:00:01 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mict42
"Don't I remember some controversy about Kerry and possible war crimes under his watch?"

Liz, That was a story that Peter Arnett concocted with a disgruntled Vet about former Senator Bob Kerrey (D-Ne)
If I remeber correctly, Arnett was fired over that bit of BS, too.


35 posted on 04/06/2003 9:02:45 AM PDT by submarinerswife (http://www.lzxray.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
If you look at all the rallies Kerry attended, they were mainly funded by ANSWER. Ramsey Clark is the head of ANSWER. Clark is clearly anti-American and pro-Communism/dictators. He's defended every despicable despot in his lifetime the world has known.

ANSWER is directly funded by Communist dictator regimes in the world. Kerry's campaign is being funded by ANSWER.

Now Kerry's anti-American remarks start to add up.

Republicans should support at least in part Kerry's bid for the Democratic nomination. Why? Because he would be absolutely torn to shreds in a national bid for presidency because of his close ties to Communism.

Also, there are clear thinking Democrats who know that Kerry will never, ever have a chance of becoming president, and the best that Kerry will ever be able to accomplish is the complete destruction of the Democratic party. In other words, divide and conquer.

Give Kerry just enough rope to hang not only himself but the Democratic Party as well.

REPUBLICANS FOR KERRY!!


36 posted on 04/06/2003 10:27:07 AM PDT by Dergie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Democrats should speak out against him, or they will soon be battling the Green Party for political relevancy.

The Democrats are bleeding Green, and by making remarks like Kerry's they are hoping to limit defections from the left wing of their party. It looks like their 2004 strategy so far is to make a desperate attempt to hold together the "coalition" they have, rather than going after moderate voters.

37 posted on 04/06/2003 10:29:52 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Funny!!!!
38 posted on 04/06/2003 10:34:27 AM PDT by Chirodoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Probably came from a secret Streisand memo.

Except her memo said "rahjeem change".

39 posted on 04/06/2003 10:41:49 AM PDT by wi jd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Feckless
"Kerry proves himself to be shameless, despicable and completely unfit for any type of political office in this nation."

If you dislike Kerry, wait till you hear about his wife Teresa! brrrr....

40 posted on 04/06/2003 10:56:17 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson